Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 9;72(1):34–40. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209488

Table 2.

Associations of childhood psychosocial adversity with age at menarche (n=8984)

Exposure Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
Mean difference in years (95% CI) P value Mean difference in years (95% CI) P value Mean difference in years (95% CI) P value
Total psychosocial adversity 0.005 (−0.034 to 0.044) 0.790 0.007 (−0.032 to 0.046) 0.729 0.006 (−0.033 to 0.045) 0.778
Lack of care 0.027 (−0.008 to 0.062) 0.134 0.023 (−0.012 to 0.058) 0.198 0.022 (−0.013 to 0.057) 0.223
Maladaptive family functioning 0.013 (−0.026 to 0.052) 0.527 0.023 (−0.016 to 0.062) 0.251 0.022 (−0.017 to 0.061) 0.273
Non-sexual abuse −0.007 (−0.056 to 0.042) 0.777 −0.003 (−0.052 to 0.046) 0.897 −0.002 (−0.051 to 0.047) 0.943
Overprotective parenting −0.003 (−0.040 to 0.034) 0.881 −0.008 (−0.045 to 0.029) 0.671 −0.009 (−0.046 to 0.028) 0.631
Parental mental illness −0.027 (−0.076 to 0.022) 0.280 −0.030 (−0.079 to 0.019) 0.220 −0.030 (−0.079 to 0.019) 0.220
Sexual abuse −0.182 (−0.235 to 0.129) <0.001 −0.172 (−0.225 to 0.119) <0.001 −0.173 (−0.226 to 0.120) <0.001

Beta coefficients are interpreted as a mean difference in age at menarche in years per SD increase in psychosocial adversity.

Model 1: unadjusted.

Model 2: adjusted for age at recruitment and ethnicity.

Model 3: adjusted for age at recruitment, educational qualifications and ethnicity.