Skip to main content
. 2017 Oct 31;72(1):7–12. doi: 10.1136/jech-2017-209811

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards model estimating the association between social relationship variables and incident dementia

Variables Categories Model 1* Model 2 Model 3‡
(n, %) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI) HR (95% CI)
Married Yes (10 232, 73.2) 0.50 (0.46 to 0.54) 0.85 (0.76 to 0.94) 0.88 (0.79 to 0.99)
Contact (relatives) Yes (12 990, 92.9) 0.74 (0.64 to 0.87) 0.85 (0.73 to 1.00) 0.89 (0.76 to 1.05)
Contact (friends) Yes (12 291, 87.9) 0.55 (0.49 to 0.62) 0.78 (0.69 to 0.88) 0.83 (0.73 to 0.94)
Group participation Yes (8671, 62.0) 0.61 (0.56 to 0.67) 0.85 (0.77 to 0.94) 0.89 (0.80 to 0.98)
Work engagement Yes (3480, 24.9) 0.52 (0.47 to 0.59) 0.85 (0.76 to 0.97) 0.88 (0.77 to 0.99)
Support (family) Yes (11 507, 82.3) 0.68 (0.62 to 0.75) 0.84 (0.76 to 0.94) 0.88 (0.79 to 0.99)
Support (relatives) Yes (7372, 52.7) 0.92 (0.84 to 1.00) 1.02 (0.93 to 1.11) 1.03 (0.95 to 1.13)
Support (friends) Yes (6121, 43.8) 0.75 (0.69 to 0.82) 0.96 (0.87 to 1.05) 0.98 (0.89 to 1.08)

*Unadjusted model.

†Association with each social variable and incident dementia is estimated. All covariates (age, gender, education, household income, Geriatric Depression Scale, subjective cognitive complaints, instrumental activities of daily living, stroke, diabetes, daily walking time and hobbies) are adjusted.

‡All social variables are simultaneously entered into the model with all covariates.