Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 4.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;46(1):137–144. doi: 10.3233/JAD-150052

Table 3.

Linear regression models for computerized cognitive scores in patients with impaired versus normal CVR – subgroup analyses

Subgroup B coefficient ± SE* p B coefficient ± SE* p p for interaction
Carotid large-vessel disease Yes (n = 229) No (n = 183)
Executive function −6.92 ± 1.81 <0.001 1.06 ± 1.98 0.59 <0.001
Memory −5.23 ± 2.21 0.02 3.36 ± 2.68 0.21 0.03
Visual Spatial −1.97 ± 2.35 0.40 0.38 ± 2.79 0.89 0.48
Attention <0.001 0.40 0.09
Global cognitive score −4.97 ± 1.50 <0.001 0.67 ± 1.84 0.72 0.02
Age (years) >60 (n = 130) ≤60 (n = 285)
Executive function −5.86 ± 2.81 0.04 −2.06 ± 1.5 0.17 0.23
Memory −1.50 ± 2.79 0.59 −1.41 ± 2.15 0.51 0.99
Visual Spatial −0.87 ± 3.45 0.80 −1.03 ± 2.11 0.63 0.87
Attention 0.11 0.01 0.78
Global cognitive score −2.99 ± 2.36 0.21 −2.19 ± 1.34 0.10 0.87
Diabetes Yes (n = 116) No (n = 229)
Executive function −5.10 ± 2.35 0.03 −2.35 ± 1.66 0.13 0.33
Memory −1.01 ± 2.86 0.73 −1.90 ± 2.14 0.38 0.82
Visual Spatial −1.21 ± 3.02 0.69 −1.13 ± 2.21 0.61 0.95
Attention 0.06 0.02 1.00
Global cognitive score −2.80 ± 1.90 0.14 −2.30 ± 1.47 0.12 0.82
*

Adjusted for age, education, previous stroke, diabetes, hypertension and depressive symptoms.

Transformation of power of 4 was used for attention cognitive domains to approximate normality (hence, only p values are tabulated).