Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 1;24(1):43–50. doi: 10.5056/jnm17032

Table 2.

The Comparison of Metrics Between Patients With and Without Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Treatment

PPI effective (n = 60) PPI failure (n = 13) P-value
Age (yr) 49.47 ± 13.47 45.31 ± 11.98 0.308
BMI (kg/m2) 24.30 ± 2.98 23.27 ± 2.49 0.249
Male (n [%]) 35.00 (58.33) 6.00 (46.15) 0.422
Erosive esophagitis (n [%]) 26.00 (43.33) 3.00 (23.08) 0.176
Hypersensitive esophagus (n [%]) 17.00 (28.33) 8.00 (61.54) 0.049
Hiatal hernia (n [%]) 9.00 (15.00) 0.00 (0.00) 0.305
DIS (μm) 0.91 ± 0.18 0.82 ± 0.17 0.114
Baseline impedance (Ω) 1621.26 ± 561.17 2117.48 ± 428.68 0.004
AET% 14.95 (4.53, 28.83) 8.00 (1.70, 13.45) 0.008
Total reflux episodes 64.50 (51.00, 78.75) 62.00 (33.00, 93.00) 0.779
Liquid reflux episodes 52.27 ± 21.53 57.15 ± 39.66 0.673
 Acid reflux episodes 30.98 ± 16.43 24.38 ± 18.38 0.203
 Non-acid reflux episodes 19.00 (10.25, 30.25) 21.00 (13.50, 45.50) 0.177
Gas reflux episodes 10.00 (7.00, 14.00) 9.00 (6.50, 17.50) 0.897
Proximal reflux episodes 26.00 (20.00, 38.00) 21.00 (12.00, 32.50) 0.133
Symptom associated with acid (n) 27 7 0.562
Symptom associated with non-acid reflux (n) 13 6 0.140

PPI, proton pump inhibitor; BMI, body mass index; DIS, dilated intercellular spaces; AET, acid exposure time.

The age, BMI, DIS, impedance, liquid reflux, and acid reflux episodes were expressed as mean ± SD, and the AET%, total reflux, non-acid reflux, gas reflux, and proximal reflux episodes were expressed as median (interquartile range).