Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 1;24(1):70–78. doi: 10.5056/jnm17019

Table 2.

Patient Characteristics of the 19 Patients Who Consented to Undergo an Anorectal Manometry According to Their Fecal Continence Status at Investigation

Variables N Continence
n (n/N, %)
Incontinence
n (n/N, %)
P-value
Age (mean ± SD, yr) 11.3 ± 6.3 12.7 ± 6.0 10.3 ± 6.6 0.441
Age groups (yr) 0.833
 > 4–10 8 2 (25.0) 6 (75.0)
 10–16 5 2 (40.0) 3 (60.0)
 > 16 6 3 (50.0) 3 (50.0)
Gender > 0.999
 Male 13 5 (38.5) 8 (61.5)
 Female 6 2 (33.3) 4 (66.7)
Neurological status 0.106
 NI patients 5 0 (0.0) 5 (100.0)
 Non-NI patients 14 7 (50.0) 7 (50.0)
Enterostomy 0.603
 Yes 15 5 (33.3) 10 (66.7)
 No 4 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0)
Resected segment 0.702
 Classic recto-sigmoid form 15 5 (33.3) 10 (66.7)
 Long segment formsa 4 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0)
Operative procedure 0.633
 Open Soave 11 5 (45.5) 6 (54.5)
 MIS Soave 8 2 (25.0) 6 (75.0)
Enterocolitis > 0.999
 Yes 3 1 (33.3) 2 (66.7)
 No 16 6 (37.5) 10 (62.5)
Postoperative complication 0.603
 Yes 4 2 (50.0) 2 (50.0)
 No 15 5 (33.3) 10 (66.7)
Constipation 0.263
 Yes 3 0 (0.0) 3 (100.0)
 No 16 7 (43.8) 9 (56.2)
Total 19 7 (36.8) 12 (63.2)
a

Long segment form includes the cases with descending, transverse, and total colon aganglionosis.

NI, neurologically impaired; MIS Soave, minimally invasive surgery Soave includes transanal endorectal pull-through with or without laparoscopic assistance.