Table 3.
Correlations among CRC Adherence with Colonoscopy and Study Variables
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Adherent with colonoscopya | Corr. p-value |
– | |||||||||||
| 2. Age | Corr. p-value |
.24 <.01 |
– | ||||||||||
| 3. Raceb | Corr. p-value |
.10 .09 |
.13 .03 |
– | |||||||||
| 4. Marital statusc | Corr. p-value |
.19 <.01 |
.25 <.01 |
.22 <.01 |
– | ||||||||
| 5. Employment statusd | Corr. p-value |
.04 .44 |
−.16 <.01 |
.10 .09 |
.11 .06 |
– | |||||||
| 6. Education | Corr. p-value |
.20 <.01 |
.14 .02 |
.09 .10 |
.16 .01 |
.10 .09 |
– | ||||||
| 7. Insurance statuse | Corr. p-value |
.20 <.01 |
.21 <.01 |
.10 .08 |
.25 <.01 |
.06 .30 |
.14 .01 |
– | |||||
| 8. Income | Corr. p-value |
.27 <.01 |
.20 <.01 |
.20 <.01 |
.48 <.01 |
.22 <.01 |
.24 <.01 |
.42 <.01 |
– | ||||
| 9. Risk-taking | Corr. p-value |
.00 .98 |
−.02 .69 |
.14 .01 |
−.03 .56 |
.02 .80 |
.14 .02 |
−.12 .04 |
.05 .39 |
– | |||
| 10. Self-reliance | Corr. p-value |
−.10 .09 |
−.05 .40 |
.09 .13 |
−.04 .52 |
−.03 .63 |
−.10 .07 |
−.03 .62 |
−.05 .40 |
.15 .01 |
– | ||
| 11. Primacy of work | Corr. p-value |
−.11 .05 |
−.12 .04 |
−.16 .01 |
−.19 <.01 |
.03 .58 |
−.14 .02 |
−.16 .01 |
−.27 <.01 |
.17 <.01 |
.19 <.01 |
– | |
| 12. Heterosexual self-presentation | Corr. p-value |
.01 .89 |
−.01 .91 |
−.15 .01 |
.02 .75 |
.00 .98 |
−.19 <.01 |
−.04 .54 |
−.11 .06 |
−.13 .02 |
.06 .32 |
.00 .95 |
– |
Note. N = 310. Significant correlations are displayed in bold. CRC = colorectal cancer; Corr = correlation.
Adherent to colonoscopy coded as 0 = no and 1 = yes.
Race coded as 0 = minority race and 1= White race.
Marital status coded as 0 = single/separated/divorced/widowed and 1 = married/partnered.
Employment status coded as 0 = unemployed/retired and 1 = employed.
Insurance status coded as 0 = no and 1 = yes.