Table 1. Descriptive statistics for questionnaire ratings of parental involvement across reporters, and daily diary variables across days.
| Nsubjects | ndays | Mean | SD | Min | Max | ICC | α/RKF | RC | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-time questionnaire | |||||||||
| Mother-child involvement | 46 | — | 3.62 | 0.41 | 2.58 | 4.00 | — | .79 | — |
| Father-child involvement | 46 | — | 3.40 | 0.46 | 2.42 | 4.00 | — | .79 | — |
|
| |||||||||
| Daily diary variables | |||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Youth daily diary | |||||||||
| Academic problems | 47 | 1418 | 0.34 | 0.86 | 0 | 5.00 | .57 | .99 | .65 |
| Peer problems | 47 | 1418 | 0.23 | 0.72 | 0 | 5.00 | .39 | .99 | .66 |
| Mother-child warmth | 47 | 1392 | 2.43 | 0.58 | 1.00 | 3.00 | .67 | 1.00 | .64 |
| Father-child warmth | 47 | 1263 | 2.33 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 3.00 | .65 | 1.00 | .63 |
| Mother-child conflict | 47 | 1392 | 1.16 | 0.34 | 1.00 | 3.00 | .32 | 1.00 | .74 |
| Father-child conflict | 47 | 1262 | 1.12 | 0.30 | 1.00 | 3.00 | .22 | .99 | .74 |
| Positive Mood | 47 | 1413 | 2.99 | 0.79 | 1.00 | 4.00 | .82 | 1.00 | .81 |
| Negative Mood | 47 | 1413 | 1.26 | 0.38 | 1.00 | 3.17 | .56 | 1.00 | .72 |
|
| |||||||||
| Mother daily diary | |||||||||
| Mother-child warmth | 47 | 1342 | 2.20 | 0.50 | 1.00 | 3.00 | .47 | .99 | .53 |
| Mother-child conflict | 47 | 1342 | 1.09 | 0.24 | 1.00 | 3.00 | .16 | .97 | .61 |
|
| |||||||||
| Father daily diary | |||||||||
| Father-child warmth | 39 | 1013 | 1.92 | 0.47 | 1.00 | 3.00 | .46 | 1.00 | .63 |
| Father-child conflict | 39 | 1015 | 1.06 | 0.20 | 1.00 | 2.67 | .10 | .99 | .53 |
|
| |||||||||
| None/some | A lot | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| ndays (%) | ndays (%) | ||||||||
|
| |||||||||
| Youth daily diary | |||||||||
| Time with mother | 47 | 1388 | 711 (51.22) | 677 (48.78) | 0 | 1.00 | .76 | — | — |
| Time with father | 47 | 1257 | 784 (62.37) | 473 (37.63) | 0 | 1.00 | .77 | — | — |
Note: RKF is an estimate of between-person reliability and is calculated across participants and days; RC is an estimate of within-person reliability (see Cranford, et al, 2006).