Table 1.

Model results predicting condomless sex with clients at follow-up (among female sex workers participating in Mujer Segura in 13 cities across Mexico, n=483)

Model Parameter	Combined (Beliefs and Evaluations) Attitudes Measure			Beliefs (Only) Measure			Evaluations (Only) Measure
	B	Wald χ2	95% CI	B	Wald χ2	95% CI	B	Wald χ2	95% CI
Main Effects
Condomless sex with clients reported at baseline	−.02	.16	−.14, .10	−.01	.05	−.07, .06	−.03	.29	−.13, .08
Negative condom attitudes	2.02	19.52***	1.12, 2.91	1.67	7.40 **	0.47, 2.87	.68	6.58 **	.16, 1.19
Intervention fidelity	.01	.12	−.02, .03	.00	.055	−.03, .04	.00	.00	.01, .00
Two-Way Interaction Effects
Baseline condomless sex × Negative condom attitudes	−.10	3.48	−.20, .01	−.08	8.82 **	−.14, −.03	−.05	.93	−.15, .05
Baseline condomless sex × Intervention fidelity	.00	.21	−.00, .00	.00	.11	−.00, .00	.00	.39	−.00, .00
Negative condom attitudes × Intervention fidelity	−.05	11.24 ***	−.07, −.02	−.04	5.26 *	−.07, −.01	−.01	2.52	−.03, .00
Three-Way Interaction Effect
Baseline condomless sex × Negative condom attitudes × Intervention Fidelity	.00	2.74	.00, .01	.00	7.06**	.00, .00	.00	.54	−.00, .00

Notes: Results from models using generalized estimating equations to control for site clustering; age, years of education, marital status, having any children, and years employed as a FSW were entered as control variables (none were statistically significant in the model);

^***p < .001,

^**p < .01,

^*p < .05