Table 4.

Prevalence of Disordered Eating Bivariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression Models Among Transgender Older Youth (19–25 year olds)

	Bivariate model	Multivariate model
	Odds ratio (95% CIs)	Odds ratio (95% CIs)
Past Year Binge Eating	n (Yes) = 173, n (No) = 308
Enacted Stigma Index	1.13 (1.04–1.22)**	1.12 (1.03–1.21)**
Social Support Scale	0.52 (0.23–1.16)	0.50 (0.21–1.20)
Age	--	0.90 (0.80–1.01)
Past Year Lose Weight by Fasting	n (Yes) = 160, n (No) = 324
Enacted Stigma Index	1.09 (1.01–1.18)*	1.09 (1.00–1.17)*
Social Support Scale	0.49 (0.22–1.10)	0.49 (0.20–1.19)
Age	--	0.89 (0.79–0.99)*
Past Year Lose Weight by Pills or Speed	n (Yes) = 21, n (No) = 463
Enacted Stigma Index	1.25 (0.08–1.45)**	1.24 (1.07–1.44)**
Social Support Scale	0.31 (0.05–2.01)	0.37 (0.05–2.61)
Age	--	0.92 (0.70–1.20)
Past Year Lose Weight by Laxatives	n (Yes) = 15, n (No) = 469
Enacted Stigma Index	1.11 (0.90–1.36)	1.09 (0.88–1.35)
Social Support Scale	0.26 (0.03–2.47)	0.18 (0.01–2.30)
Age	--	0.97 (0.69–1.35)
Past Year Lose Weight by Throwing Up	n (Yes) = 28, n (No) = 456
Enacted Stigma Index	1.21 (1.05–1.39)**	1.20 (1.03–1.38)*
Social Support Scale	0.18 (0.03–0.97)*	0.29 (0.05–1.73)
Age	--	0.81 (0.63–1.05)

Note.

^*p < .05,

^**p < .01.

Odds ratios reflect analyses of predictors on 0–1 scale.