Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Int J Eat Disord. 2016 Nov 12;50(5):515–522. doi: 10.1002/eat.22627

Table 5.

Probabilities of Disordered Eating Behaviors by Low/High Enacted Stigma and Presence of Protective Factors for 14–18 and 19–25 Year Old Transgender Youth

14–18 year old transgender youth 19–25 year old transgender youth


Behavior High Enacted Stigma (%) Low Enacted Stigma (%) High Enacted Stigma (%) Low Enacted Stigma (%)
(past year) 0 PF FC Only SC Only PFC Only 2 PF 0 PF FC Only SC Only PFC Only 2 PF Low Social Support High Social Support Low Social Support High Social Support




Binge Eating 71.2 52.8 59.6 -- 40.1 47.2 28.8 34.8 -- 19.4 88.2 54.0 82.2 42.2
Lose weight by…
 Fasting 85.0 -- 67.5 64.9 40.4 53.3 -- 29.5 27.1 12.0 82.3 54.5 74.1 42.5
 Pills 23.9 5.3 -- 5.1 1.0 13.3 2.7 -- 2.6 1.0 73.0 7.2 58.0 3.8
 Purging 43.1 8.6 -- 29.2 4.9 24.4 3.9 -- 15.0 2.1 73.0 7.2 5.8 1.5
 Laxatives 14.0 1.1 12.6 -- 1.0 10.8 1.0 9.6 -- 1.0 78.3 16.1 60.7 7.6

Note: 0 PF = No protective factors; FC Only = family connectedness only; SC Only = School connectedness only; PFC Only = perception of friends caring only; 2 PF = two protective factors present. Two dashes represent that the protective factor was not significant in the corresponding model.