Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Consult Clin Psychol. 2017 Nov 27;86(1):1–14. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000257

Table 5.

Model fit statistics and estimates of fixed and random effects for multilevel latent growth of 1) DASS and 2) indirect effect from treatment to DASS via family cohesion

Model 1: DASS only Model 2: DASS and cohesion
Model Fit Statistics
Chi-square χ2(3) = 8.364, p=.40 χ2(12) = 15.42, p=.22
RMSEA 0.013 0.033
CFI 0.997 0.979
SRMRwithin 0.083 0.089
SRMRbetween 0.118 0.114

Fixed Effects Estimate (SE) 95% CI Estimate (SE) 95% CI

DASS intercept (α) 37.66** (3.61) [30.59, 44.73] 37.43** (2.22) [33.07, 41.78]
DASS slope (β) −0.14 (0.83) [−1.77, 1.48] −0.60 (0.70) [−1.80, 0.59]
Cohesion_0 5.92** (0.22) [5.48, 6.35]
Cohesion change (δ) −0.46 (0.31) [−1.07, 0.16]
Treatment → α 1.07 (4.40) [−7.55, 9.69] 1.16** (0.20) [0.77, 1.54]
Treatment → β −4.39** (1.05) [−6.44. −2.34] −3.57** (0.32) [−4.19, −2.95]
Treatment → 0.14 (0.25) [−0.36, 0.63]
cohesion_0
Treatment → δ 0.94** (0.23) [0.49, 1.38]
Cohesion_0 → δ −0.03* (0.02) [−0.06, −0.01]
δβ −0.93** (0.10) [−1.13, −0.73]
Indirect effect (a*b) −0.87** (0.31) [−1.47, −0.27]

Random Effects Estimate (SE) 95% CI Estimate (SE) 95% CI

σ2 within person 111.92** (40.18) [33.18, 190.66] 107.52** (23.93) [60.61, 154.43]
σ2 within families
 Time-specific variance 0.01 (4.51) [0, 0] 0 (<.001) [0, 0]
 DASS intercept 796.65** (104.25) [592.33, 1000.97] 811.52** (88.07) [638.90, 984.15]
 DASS slope 15.71* (7.80) [0.42, 31.00] 17.05* (6.81) [3.71, 30.39]
 DASS intercept, slope −85.73** (20.01) [−124.95, −46.50] −94.96** (20.74) [−135.61, −54.31]
σ2 between families
 DASS intercept 163.15* (90.80) [−14.81, 341.10] 155.36** (0.29) [154.80, 155.92]
 Cohesion_0 3.25** (0.36) [2.55, 3.96]
 Cohesion change 2.58** (0.54) [1.53, 3.63]
 DASS int., cohesion_0 −16.23** (0.82) [−17.83, −14.64]
*

indicates p<.05,

**

indicates p<0.01.