Skip to main content
. 2017 May 25;26(1):125–135. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4579-6

Table 2.

Reliability and validity results for the six radiographic parameters

Reliability Validity
Intraobserver R. Interobserver R. Convergent V. Discriminant V.
ICC 2,1 (95% CI) [n = 35, 2 measures] ICC 2,1 (95% CI) [n = 35, 3 observer] Pearson’s r [n = 7, neutral] Pearson’s r [n = 49/91, w/variation] ES η 2 [n = 91]
Vertical displacement
 CC 0.956 (0.712–0.993) 0.985 (0.928–0.997) 0.833* 0.778*/0.706* 0.743
 AC–DC 0.993 (0.982–0.997) 0.998 (0.996–1.000) 0.972* 0.960*/0.939* 0.952
 CCran 0.827 (-0.440–0.956) 0.964 (0.909–0.984) 0.495 0.460*/0.473* 0.905
Horizontal displacement
 OL 0.805 (0.647–0.897) 0.945 (0.906–0.970) −0.488 −0.433*/−0.385* 0.587
 LE 0.925 (0.855–0.961) 0.987 (0.977–0.993) 0.387 0.383*/0.346* 0.713
 GC–PC 0.985 (0.970–0.992) 0.995 (0.991–0.997) 0.968* 0.962*/0.952* 0.964

Reliability is calculated for intra- and interobserver measurement and presented with intraclass Coefficient (ICC 2,1) and 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI). Convergent validity are presented by Pearson’s correlation coefficient (Pearson’s r) and are calculated for neutral orientation only (n = 7), 10° projectional variation included (n = 49) and 20° projectional variation included (n = 91). Discriminant validity is represented by effect size (ES η 2)

* Values are significant at level <0.05