Table 2.
Different protein expression between Si treated and Si untreated plant. Protein information was identified by mass and plant samples harvested at 12 h after Si application
| Spot No | Protein name | Exp MW/PI | Theo MW/PI | SC (%) | Expression Pattern | Accession No |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1022 | Rieske Fe-S precursor protein | 21.09/4.93 | 24.21/9.2 | 22 | up | gi|50,508,582 |
| 2106 | Putative thioredoxin-like protein CDSP32 | 29.26/5.01 | 32.48/6.3 | 34 | up | gi|34,901,636 |
| 2204 | Putative Ser/The protein Phosphatase | 36.54/5.00 | 35.26/5.1 | 19 | down | gi|34,911,376 |
| 2605 | Putative glucose-6-phosphate isomerase | 64.17/5.01 | 68.86/5.7 | 20 | down | gi|50,900,276 |
| 2607 | Importin alpha 1b | 62.30/5.03 | 59.09/5.2 | 26 | up | gi|6,682,927 |
| 4011 | unnamed protein product | 21.08/5.56 | 15.90/5.7 | 25 | down | gi|34,895,594 |
| 5011 | Rieske Fe-S precursor protein | 20.89/6.20 | 24.21/9.2 | 17 | up | gi|50,508,582 |
Expression pattern indicated a comparison with control. Accession number (GI number), MW Molecular weight, PI Isoeletronic point, SC Sequence coverage, Theo Theoretical value