. 2018 Jan 5;19:19. doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-4414-y

Table 2.

Alignment of RRBS data and CpG quantification

Sampler	HRG		ICRG					Common human CpGs (%)
Sampler	Alignment efficiency (%)	n. of human CpGs^a	Alignment efficiency (%)	Reads mapped to the human genome (%)	Reads mapped to the mouse genome (%)	n. of human CpGs^a	n. of moue CpGs^a	Common human CpGs (%)
Case_1_Normal	72.2	2,317,726	72.2	99.9	0.1	2,315,989	102	99.9
Case_1_Tumuor	74.1	2,676,050	74.1	99.9	0.1	2,674,961	119	99.9
Case_1_PDTX3	71.5	3,560,299	73.8	96.8	3.2	3,556,996	223,997	99.9
Case_2_Normal	70.6	1,893,234	70.6	99.9	0.1	1,891,949	60	99.9
Case_2_Tumuor	71.2	2,071,412	72.1	98.8	1.2	2,070,098	452	99.9
Case_2_PDTX1	68.5	2,132,270	73.4	93.2	6.8	2,130,231	90,072	99.8
Case_3_PDTX2	67.4	2,620,064	70.8	95.2	4.8	2,617,504	99,418	99.8
Case_3_PDTX3	54.7	1,623,532	71.0	76.9	23.1	1,620,101	339,859	99.7
Case_4_PDTX1	73.1	2,812,733	75.0	97.4	2.6	2,811,314	47,455	99.9
Case_4_PDTX2	69.1	1,503,423	72.3	95.6	4.4	1,501,890	13,819	99.8
Case_4_PDTX3	71.1	1,468,861	74.0	96.1	3.9	1,467,659	24,082	99.9
Case_4_PDTX5	69.2	3,185,468	73.5	94.0	6.0	3,182,452	264,898	99.9
Case_5_Tumuor	72.8	3,004,752	72.8	99.9	0.1	3,003,290	87	99.9
Case_5_PDTX3	65.8	2,066,808	70.6	93.0	7.0	2,064,469	179,031	99.8

^acoverage > 5