Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 5;7:1. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0670-9

Table 3.

Comparison of five randomized controlled trials of botulinum toxin in post-stroke lower limb spasticity

Study characteristics Tao W et al. Kaji R et al. Johnson C et al. Pittock S et al. Burbaud P et al.
Age group (years) 18–80 22–80 44–78 51–69 14–72
Primary outcome measure Gait analysis
Spasticity
MAS ankle score Gait velocity 2 min
Walking distance
Subjective rating of treatment efficacy
Sample size
Study length
Follow-up
n = 23
12 weeks
4 and 8 weeks
n = 120
12 weeks
4, 6, 8, and 12 weeks
n = 21
12 weeks
2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks
n = 234
12 weeks
4, 8, and 12 weeks
n = 23
4 months
0, 4, 12, and 16 weeks
Power calculation None Yes None Yes None
Inclusion criteria Post-stroke
Ambulatory status not specified
Post-stroke
Ambulatory status
not specified
Post-stroke
Patients were
ambulatory
Post-stroke
All patients could walk > 5 m
Post-stroke and trauma
Non-homogenous
Two patients could not ambulate
Intervention EMG guided, 200 botox, gastrocnemius, soleus, tibialis EMG guided, 300 botox, gastrocnemius, soleus, tibialis posterior EMG guided, 1200 Dysport, gastrocnemius soleus, tibialis posterior No EMG
500–1500 Dysport
Gastrocnemius and soleus
EMG guided, 1000 Dysport, gastrocnemius, posterior, flexor digitorum longus
Statistical methods Mean (SD), t tests, chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis Mean (SD), t tests, area under curve, Wilcoxon Mean (SD), ANCOVA, graphic plots Mean (SD), one-way ANCOVA, Dunets test, Rank test Mann-Whitney
Study results Gait speed ⇧ Sig
MAS ⇩Sig
FMA ⇧ Sig
MBI ⇧ Sig
Gait speed ⇨ N.S
MAS ⇩ Sig
CGI ⇨ N.S
PRS ⇨ N.S
Gait speed ⇧ sig
MAS ⇩ Sig,
RMA ⇩ Sig,
SF-36 ⇨ N.S
2-min walk ⇨ N.S
Step length ⇨N.S
Aids ⇨ N.S.
Subjective ⇨ N.S
MAS ⇩ Sig,
RMA ⇨ N.S
MAS ⇩ Sig,
FMA ⇩ sig,
Spasticity ⇨ N.S
Secondary outcome measures MAS, FMA, MBI, sEMG Physician Rating Scale of gait, gait velocity, CGI, safety MAS, PCI, RMA, SF-36 MAS, step length, RMA, active and passive range of ankle movement MAS, FMA, gait velocity
Concurrent therapy Standardized Not standardized Standardized 38% received therapy Not standardized

MAS Modified Ashworth Scale, FMA Fugl-Meyer Assessment, MBI Modified Barthel Index, sEMG surface electromyograph, CGI Clinical Global Impression, RMA Rivermead Motor Assessment, EMG electromyograph, Sig significant, N.S not significant