Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 5;13(1):e0189138. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189138

Table 7. Validation of the developed phenology model through comparison of observed and simulated developmental and mortality rates of Ceratitis rosa and Ceratitis quilicii life stages.

Eggs Larvae Pupa Euclidian distance
Developmental time (days) Mortality
(%)
Developmental time (days) Mortality (%) Developmental time (days) Mortality (%)
C. rosa Simulated 2.325 ± 0.06 0.108 ± 0.06 9.105 ± 0.16 0.198 ± 0.06 11.873 ± 0.32 0.588 ± 0.18 Egg 6.40
Observed 2.253 ± 0.15 0.151 ± 0.02 8.956 ± 0.10 0.139 ± 0.01 11.736 ± 0.12 0.662 ± 0.07 Larva 14.88
P-value 0.0002 0.0045 0.0011 0.0005 0.0587 0.0657 Pupa 16.20
Female 8.61
Male 17.04
C. quilicii Simulated 2.048 ± 0.11 0.102 ± 0.04 9.060 ± 0.12 0.165 ± 0.06 12.182 ± 0.16 0.594 ± 0.13 Egg 6.39
Observed 2.098 ± 0.35 0.137 ± 0.21 9.100 ± 0.17 0.146 ± 0.09 12.019 ± 0.23 0.601 ± 0.19 Larva 10.99
P-value 0.0404 0.0030 0.1552 0.1405 0.0006 0.8272 Pupa 8.89
Female 9.18
Male 11.12

Average ± SE: standard errors are calculated from the observed and simulated life table data