Table 3. Comparison of dose distributions between VMAT plans using AAA and Acuros XB calculations on synCT and CT.
Comparison between plans | Median (Q1, Q3) of dose difference average (Gy) | Median (range) of gamma passing rates (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
1%/1mm | 2%/2mm | |||
synCT.vs. CT | AAA | 0.13 (0.11, 0.17) | 98.9 (91.9–100.0) | 99.9 (99.4–100.0) |
Acuros XB | 0.20 (0.16, 0.23) | 96.3 (89.9–98.4) | 99.2 (97.7–99.9) | |
AAA.vs. Acuros XB | CT | 0.38 (0.35, 0.40) | 93.4 (90.6–95.7) | 99.7 (99.7–99.9) |
SynCT | 0.38 (0.35, 0.41) | 93.6 (87.8–94.7) | 99.8 (99.6–99.9) |