Table 2.

Logistic Regression Predicting Different Forms of Dating Violence Among Girls and Boys

	Psychological violence			Physical violence			Sexual violence
	OR	p value	[98% CI]	OR	p value	[98% CI]	OR	p value	[98% CI]
Girls	F(14,13) = 15.39, p = .0001			F(14,13) = 9.23, p = .0001			F(14,13) =10.12, p = .0001
CSA	1.41	0.01	[1.10 – 1.81]	1.88	< 0.001	[1.42 – 2.49]	1.69	< 0.001	[1.30 – 2.20]
Witness	1.45	< 0.001	[1.17 – 1.78]	1.47	0.04	[1.03 – 2.12]	1.25	0.11	[0.95 – 1.64]
PA	0.98	0.88	[0.78 – 1.24]	1.10	0.58	[0.78 – 1.54]	1.30	0.05	[1.00 – 1.70]
IPV Psy	1.39	0.01	[1.10 – 1.77]	1.28	0.23	[0.85 – 1.91]	1.39	0.05	[1.00 – 1.93]
IPV Phy	1.15	0.20	[0.93 – 1.43]	1.19	0.32	[0.83 – 1.69]	1.12	0.46	[0.83 – 1.50]
Boys	F(14,10) = 4.89, p = .008			F(14,10) = 6.63, p = .0024			F(12,12) = 2.85, p = .041
CSA	2.53	0.01	[1.31 – 4.90]	2.15	0.03	[1.11 – 4.15]	3.35	0.01	[1.50 – 7.48]
Witness	1.70	< 0.001	[1.23 – 2.35]	1.46	0.05	[1.00 – 2.15]	1.21	0.40	[0.76 – 1.93]
PA	0.98	0.91	[0.67 – 1.42]	1.30	0.08	[0.97 – 1.74]	2.30	< 0.001	[1.40 – 3.77]
IPV Psy	1.57	< 0.001	[1.18 – 2.07]	0.89	0.39	[0.67 – 1.18]	1.83	0.09	[0.90 – 3.70]
IPV Phy	0.98	0.94	[0.61 – 1.57]	1.48	0.11	[0.90 – 2.42]	0.95	0.86	[0.51 – 1.76]

Note. Model controlled for age, education level, language spoken and family structure.

CSA = Child sexual abuse, PA = Physical abuse, Witness = Witnessing violence, IPV Psy = Exposure to interparental psychological violence, IPV Phy = Exposure to interparental physical violence