Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2017 Nov 22;81(1):171–178. doi: 10.1007/s00280-017-3484-5

Table 1.

Liposomal cytarabine, daunorubicin, and metabolite model: Final parameter, standard error, and median bootstrap estimates with 95% confidence intervals.

Cytarabine Parameter Estimates Standard Error Bootstrapa Median (95% CI)
CL(P)10 (L/hr) 0b - -
CL(P)12 (L/hr) 0.095 0.009 0.095 (0.079 – 0.114)
CL(M)20 (L/hr) 1.73 0.24 1.74 (1.29 – 2.32)
Q(M) (L/hr) 1.44 0.54 1.37 (0.036 – 4.06)
V(P)1 (L) 4.86 0.27 4.87 (4.34 – 5.45)
V(M)2 (L) 2.15 0.78 2.26 (0.5 – 4.23)
V(M)3 (L) 115.9c - -
Weight on V(P)1 0.70d 0.12 0.70 (0.41 – 0.64)
Variability
ETA1 (CL(P)12) 52.4% 6.3% 50.8% (40.2% – 64.3%)
ETA2 (CL(M)20) 113.6% 12.5% 109.1% (72.2% – 146.2%)
ETA3 (V(P)1) 36.7% 7.8% 35.2% (19.7% – 50.6%)
Error
EPS1 (Proportional Parent) 16.0% 1.1% 16.1% (14.0% – 18.5%)
EPS2 (Proportional Metabolite) 51.5% 3.7% 50.6% (43.2% – 56.7%)
EPS3 (Additive Parent) 1.1 0.29 1.12 (0.54 – 1.83)
Daunorubicin Parameter Estimates Standard Error Bootstrape Median (95% CI)
CL(P)10 (L/hr) 0b - -
CL(P)12 (L/hr) 0.109 0.0079 0.109 (0.094 – 0.128)
CL(M)20 (L/hr) 8.20 1.83 7.77 (4.53 – 13.565)
Q(M) (L/hr) 3.74 (Fixed) - -
V(P)1 (L) 3.65 0.153 3.65 (3.32 – 3.97)
V(M)2 (L) 440 79.5 444.5 (329 – 670)
V(M)3 (L) 591f - -
Weight on V(P)1 0.705g 0.095 0.71 (0.51 – 0.93)
Variability
ETA1 (CL(P)12) 44.4% 4.3% 45.5% (35.8% – 61.9%)
ETA2 (CL(M)20) 157.5% 32.2% 162.8% (107.7% – 229.3%)
ETA3 (V(P)1) 24.1% 5.6% 24.1% (13.3% – 36.5%)
Error
EPS1 (Proportional Parent) 15.03% 1.75% 15.9% (11.8% – 25.7%)
EPS2 (Proportional Metabolite) 55.50% 12.60% 53.6% (28.6% – 77.0%)
EPS3 (Additive Parent) 0.84 0.24 0.68 (0.006 – 1.23)
EPS4 (Additive Metabolite) 0.0034 0.000054 0.0036 (0.0025 – 0.0046)
a

Bootstrap evaluation of the final cytarabine model had an 86% convergence rate.

b

Clearance of parent independent of the major pathway (CL(P)10) was fixed to 0.

c

VSS(M)= V(M)2 + V(M)3 was fixed to 118 L.

d

Weight (WTKG) was an independent predictor of liposomal volume: (WTKG/76)0.7.

e

Bootstrap evaluation of the final daunorubicin model had a 99% convergence rate.

f

VSS(M)= V(M)2 + V(M)3 was fixed to 1031 L.

g

Weight (WTKG) was an independent predictor of liposomal volume: (WTKG/76)0.705.