Table 2.
Predictor | β | t | p | ΔR2 | F(model) | p(model) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analysis 1: DMN Connectivity (PCC/Precuneus – vmPFC) | ||||||
Step 1 | .016 | .554 | .462 | |||
FD | .128 | .744 | .462 | |||
Step 2 | .399 | 11.38 | .000 | |||
FD | .166 | 1.23 | .229 | |||
Impaired Clinical Insight* | .633 | 4.68 | .000 | |||
Analysis 2: FPN Connectivity (Right dlPFC – IPL) | ||||||
Step 1 | .000 | .002 | .962 | |||
FD | −.008 | −.047 | .962 | |||
Step 2 | .033 | .552 | .581 | |||
FD | −.019 | −.110 | .913 | |||
Impaired Clinical Insight | −.183 | −1.05 | .302 | |||
Analysis 3: DMN – FPN Connectivity (PCC/Precuneus – dlPFC) | ||||||
Step 1 | .107 | 3.95 | .055 | |||
FD | .327 | 1.99 | .055 | |||
Step 2 | .073 | 3.50 | .042 | |||
FD* | .343 | 2.13 | .040 | |||
Impaired Clinical Insight | .270 | 1.68 | .102 | |||
Analysis 4: Primary Visual Cortex – DMN Connectivity (Primary Visual Cortex – PCC/Precuneus) | ||||||
Step 1 | .170 | 6.77 | .014 | |||
FD | .412 | 2.60 | .014 | |||
Step 2 | .004 | 3.37 | .047 | |||
FD* | .409 | 2.54 | .016 | |||
Impaired Clinical Insight | −.063 | −.390 | .699 | |||
Analysis 5: DMN Connectivity Controlling for Symptom Severity | ||||||
Step 1 | .016 | .554 | .462 | |||
FD | .128 | .744 | .462 | |||
Step 2 | .122 | 1.66 | .196 | |||
FD | .076 | .452 | .654 | |||
Positive Symptoms | .173 | .840 | .407 | |||
Disorganized Symptoms | .223 | 1.08 | .288 | |||
Step 3 | .285 | 5.50 | .002 | |||
FD | .186 | 1.30 | .203 | |||
Positive Symptoms | −.087 | −.473 | .639 | |||
Disorganized Symptoms | −.038 | −.205 | .839 | |||
Impaired Clinical Insight* | .705 | 3.85 | .001 |
Note, FD, framewise displacement; PCC, posterior cingulate cortex; vmPFC, ventromedial prefrontal cortex; IPL, inferior parietal lobule
Predictor variable significantly predicts outcome variable