Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 4;55(1):72–81. doi: 10.1007/s13197-017-2792-4

Table 1.

Physicochemical characterization of sugarcane alcoholic fermented beverage in three repetitions (mean ± standard deviation)

Parameter A B C
Titrable acidity (meq L−1) 67.64a1 ± 0.4 66.65a1 ± 0.4 67.64a1 ± 0.4
Volatile acidity (meq L−1) 1.5782a1 ± 0.0 1.5782a1 ± 0.0 1.5782a1 ± 0.0
pH 4.01a1 ± 0.0 4.03a2 ± 0.0 4.05a3 ± 0.0
Reducing sugar (g GLU 100 g−1) 0.08a1 ± 0.02 0.07a1 ± 0.01 0.06a1 ± 0.01
Total sugar (g GLU 100 g−1) 0.08a1 ± 0.005 0.07a1 ± 0.002 0.06a1 ± 0.0
Density (g cm−3) 0.9911a1 ± 0.0 0.991a1 ± 0.0 0.991a1 ± 0.0
DM (g L−1) 11.69a1 ± 0.4 12.00a1 ± 0.4 12.85a1 ± 0.4
RDM (g L−1) 13.65a1 ± 0.1 13.97a1 ± 0.9 14.82a1 ± 0.03
Alcohol/RDM 4.69a2 ± 0.4 4.59a2 ± 0.4 4.32a1 ± 0.4
Sulfate (g K2SO4 L−1) <0.7 <0.7 <0.7
Chloride (g L−1) <0.2 <0.2 <0.2
Protein (%) 0.0050a1 ± 0.0 a1±0.0 a1±0.0

Values identified by the same letter, in the line, are not significantly different at the 0.05 level (Scott–Knott test)

GLU glucose, DM dry matter, RDM reduced dry matter