Table 3.

Summary of results obtained from graphs based on asserted axioms vs graphs semantically generated

Relationship	Species	Database	Type of interaction	AUC			SRvsELK(false)		SRvsELK(true)		ELK(false)vsELK(true)
				SR	ELK (true)	ELK (false)	AUC difference	Two-tailed test	AUC difference	Two-tailed test	AUC difference	Two-tailed test
SubClassOf	Mouse	GA	IGI	0.88643	0.90463	0.90463	-0.01820	1.54×10−05	-0.01820	1.54×10−05	0	1
	Yeast	BG	Genetic	0.64086	0.651407	0.651407	-0.01055	2.93×10−22	-0.01055	2.93×10−22	0	1
		BG	Physical	0.70577	0.71460	0.71460	-0.00882	1.88×10−10	-0.00882	1.88×10−10	0	1
SubClassOf PartOf	Yeast	BG	Physical	0.70723	0.71559	0.71559	-0.00836	1.36×10−09	-0.00836	1.36×10−9	0	0.99984
SubClassOf PartOf Regulates	Mouse	GA	IGI	0.88979	0.90772	0.90767	-0.01793	1.61×10−05	-0.017988	1.71×10−05	5.10×10−05	0.98979
	Yeast	BG	Genetic	0.64785	0.65923	0.65923	-0.01138	1.22×10−24	-0.01138	1.20×10−24	− 2.00×10−06	0.99832
		BG	Physical	0.70944	0.71756	0.71755	-0.00812	3.66×10−09	-0.00811	3.83×10−09	1.00×10−05	0.99394

We have generated three types of graphs: a) only taking into account SubClassOf relationship; b) considering SubClassOf and PartOf; and c) finally SubClassOf, PartOf and Regulates. The table shows the performance obtained from predicting genetic and physical interactions for those model organisms that the statistical tests provide a significant results