Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec;7(6):668–677. doi: 10.21037/qims.2017.11.02

Table 1. Comparing the mean measurements of specified anatomical landmarks acquired from the original CT data, edited STL files, and the scaled down 3D printed liver model.

Paired comparisons Paired samples statistics (mm) Paired samples test (paired differences)
Total mean Standard deviation Mean difference (mm) 95% confidence interval of the difference t df P
Lower (mm) Upper (mm)
Pair 1
   CT data 18.28 9.31 2.65 –3.65 8.95 0.93 11 0.37
   STL files 15.63 8.06
Pair 2
   CT data 18.28 9.31 3.81 –1.93 9.55 1.46 11 0.17
   3D liver model 14.47 7.71
Pair 3
   STL files 15.63 8.06 1.16 –0.31 2.63 1.74 11 0.11
   3D liver model 14.47 7.71

3D, three-dimensional; CT, computed tomography; STL, standard tessellation language; t, t-statistic; df, degrees of freedom; P, P value.