Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 23;8(1):25–35. doi: 10.1002/ece3.3600

Table 2.

Results from ANCOVAs for habitat choice, subsequent to the MANOVAs in Table 1. Degrees of freedom (df), F, and p‐value (p) are given for each

df F p
Anolis cristatellus
Ambient temperature 1, 216 55.822 <.001
Perch temperature 1, 216 0.331 .566
Humidity 1, 216 99.237 <.001
Perch height 1, 216 5.868 .016
Perch diameter 1, 216 9.012 .003
Perch proximity 1, 216 23.067 <.001
Vegetative canopy 1, 216 4.028 .046
Manmade canopy 1, 216 1.437 .232
Perch roughness 1, 216 1.589 .209
Anolis stratulus
Ambient temperature 1, 212 47.060 <.001
Perch temperature 1, 212 29.113 <.001
Humidity 1, 212 2.660 .104
Perch height 1, 212 0.197 .658
Perch diameter 1, 212 40.113 <.001
Perch proximity 1, 212 0.187 .666
Vegetative canopy 1, 212 319.157 <.001
Manmade canopy 1, 212 104.938 <.001
Perch roughness 1, 212 238.820 <.001

Shaded cells are significant for difference between use and availability at the significance level indicated by the last column.