Table 2.
Results from ANCOVAs for habitat choice, subsequent to the MANOVAs in Table 1. Degrees of freedom (df), F, and p‐value (p) are given for each
df | F | p | |
---|---|---|---|
Anolis cristatellus | |||
Ambient temperature | 1, 216 | 55.822 | <.001 |
Perch temperature | 1, 216 | 0.331 | .566 |
Humidity | 1, 216 | 99.237 | <.001 |
Perch height | 1, 216 | 5.868 | .016 |
Perch diameter | 1, 216 | 9.012 | .003 |
Perch proximity | 1, 216 | 23.067 | <.001 |
Vegetative canopy | 1, 216 | 4.028 | .046 |
Manmade canopy | 1, 216 | 1.437 | .232 |
Perch roughness | 1, 216 | 1.589 | .209 |
Anolis stratulus | |||
Ambient temperature | 1, 212 | 47.060 | <.001 |
Perch temperature | 1, 212 | 29.113 | <.001 |
Humidity | 1, 212 | 2.660 | .104 |
Perch height | 1, 212 | 0.197 | .658 |
Perch diameter | 1, 212 | 40.113 | <.001 |
Perch proximity | 1, 212 | 0.187 | .666 |
Vegetative canopy | 1, 212 | 319.157 | <.001 |
Manmade canopy | 1, 212 | 104.938 | <.001 |
Perch roughness | 1, 212 | 238.820 | <.001 |
Shaded cells are significant for difference between use and availability at the significance level indicated by the last column.