Skip to main content
Journal of Thoracic Disease logoLink to Journal of Thoracic Disease
. 2017 Dec;9(12):E1088–E1095. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.11.111

Primary thoracic extraskeletal osteosarcoma: a case report and literature review

Jie Qian 1, Xue-Yan Zhang 1, Ping Gu 1, Jin-Chen Shao 2, Bao-Hui Han 1,, Hui-Min Wang 1,
PMCID: PMC5756970  PMID: 29312772

Abstract

Primary extraskeletal osteosarcoma (ESOS) presenting in thoracic locations is very rare and associated with a poor prognosis. The current study presents a case involving a large anterior mediastinal mass, which was histologically confirmed as a primary osteosarcoma. The literature concerning primary thoracic ESOS is reviewed. A total of 60 cases were identified. The median age was 60 years (range, 14–93 years) and males were more prevalent among the reported cases (65%). Survival analysis revealed that the overall 5-year survival was only 22.3%. The majority of cases of thoracic ESOS presented in the lung (n=24, 40%), with others presenting in the mediastinum, pleura, or chest wall. The benefit of surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy was confirmed by Cox regression survival analyses.

Keywords: Extraskeletal osteosarcoma, thoracic, literature review

Introduction

Extraskeletal osteosarcoma (ESOS) is a malignant neoplasm producing osteoid in places other than bones or periosteum (1). Primary ESOS presenting in thoracic locations is very rare and associated with a poor prognosis. However, previously reported sporadic cases of primary thoracic ESOS did not provide a comprehensive profile of clinical manifestations. The optimal treatment of thoracic ESOS is largely unknown. Here we presented a case of primary ESOS located in the mediastinum. We discuss the clinico-characteristics with a review of the related literature.

Case presentation

A 55-year-old woman with a 3-month history of a palpable neck mass, progressive dyspnea and weight loss was admitted. She had a history of aluminum dust exposure and type 2 diabetes, but otherwise had no other major medical problems. Her general status was poor and a physical examination was unremarkable except for a palpable lymphadenopathy in the supraclavicular fossa. The blood biochemistry tests on admission showed largely normal results. A routine blood test, liver and kidney function tests, and levels of C-reactive protein, alkaline phosphatase and blood calcium were all normal. The tumor markers CEA, CYFRA21-1, SCC-Ag, NSE, and CA125 were within the normal range.

Contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) of the chest detected a 9.0 cm × 6.4 cm soft-tissue mass with irregular contours in the anterior mediastinum. The trachea was significantly compressed and the relationship between the mass and the adjacent vessels was unclear. A quasicircular calcification was visualized in the mass (regional SUV 63 HU). The enlarged mediastinal lymph nodes had merged with the mass (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Computed tomogram of the lung showed an irregular mass (9.0 cm × 6.4 cm) with accompanying calcification or ossification in the anterior mediastinum.

Fine-needle aspiration cytology of the supraclavicular lymph node showed interstitial fibrosis with diffused malignant small round cell involvement. An immunohistochemistry analysis did not provide clues of where the tumor originated. A whole-body PET/CT did not suggest another primary site either.

The tumor was surgically resected through a median sternotomy. Intraoperative findings revealed that the tumor was hard and protruded into bilateral anonymous veins, the superior vena cava, diaphragm and vagus nerve. Prosthetic replacement of the superior vena cava was performed. The right upper lobe was involved and a wedge resection was performed.

Histologically, the tumor was 11 cm × 10 cm × 10 cm in size without a complete capsule. The cut surface was grayish yellow and necrosis was detected. A large amount of collagen and osteoid tissues had formed (Figure 2). Immunohistochemical studies showed positive staining for vimentin and were negative for S-100, CD56 and CD34. These pathologic findings are consistent with osteosarcoma. No evidence of an extra-thoracic primary tumor could be obtained through imaging studies. The tumor was therefore diagnosed as a primary osteosarcoma of the mediastinum.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Microscopic findings show malignant cartilaginous foci. H&E staining. Magnification: (A) ×100; (B) ×200.

The patient received best supportive care after the operation because of her poor performance status and died 2 months later.

Discussion

Epidemiology and clinical characteristics

ESOS is a malignant neoplasm producing osteoid in places other than bones or periosteum. It accounts for approximately 1–2% of all soft tissue sarcomas and 2–4% of all osteosarcomas (1). Individuals older than 30 years are the most commonly affected population for ESOS, which is quite different from patients with bone osteosarcoma. The prognosis of patients with ESOS remains poor, with reported 5-year survival rates varying from 25% to 66% (2-4).

Primary intrathoracic ESOS is extremely rare and a total of 60 ESOS cases have been reported in the international literature (Table 1). The majority of cases of thoracic ESOS have presented in the lung (n=24, 40%), with 9, 14 and 9 cases presenting in the mediastinum, pleura, or chest wall, respectively. Four additional chest ESOS cases did not document specific locations.

Table 1. Patient characteristics.

Location Case No. Age Sex Symptom Size (cm) Reference Treatment Survival (months)
Mediastinum (n=9) 1 19 M Swelling Wilson [1941] (5) DOD 2 months after onset
2 22 M Chest pain, mild dyspnea 13 Ikeda [1974] (6) Surgery, RT CDF 60+ months postop
3 30 M Dyspnea on exertion, fatigue Catanese [1988] (7) DOD 1 m after onset
4 69 F 8.5 Greenwood [1989] (8) Surgery
5 68 M 10 Burt [1995] (9) Surgery CDF 38+ months postop
6 21 M Dyspnea 7 Ulusakarya [1999] (10) Surgery, CT DOD 4 months postop
7 77 F Shortness of breath 16 Hishida [2009] (11) Surgery DOD 4 months postop
8 38 F Cough 5.5 Yu [2015] (12) Surgery, CT CDF 28+ months postop
9 56 F Neck mass 11 Our case Surgery DOD 2 months postop
Lung (n=24) 10 35 F Chills, fever 7 Greenspan [1933] (13) DOD 11 months after onset
11 74 F Progressive athmatic symptoms Yamashita [1964] (14) DOD 6 months after onset
12 66 M Dyspnea, chest pain, hemoptysis >10 Nosanchuk [1969] (15) DOD 4 months after onset
13 62 M Pneumonia 6 Reingold [1971] (16) CT DOD 7 months after onset
14 56 F Chills, fever, chest pain 7 Reingold [1971] (16) Surgery CDF 14 months after onset
15 49 F Bagarić [1982] (17) DOD
16 77 F Asymptomatic 4 Nascimento [1982] (18) Surgery DUC 6 months postop
17 72 M Asymptomatic 5.5 Nascimento [1982] (18) Surgery DUC 10 months postop
18 81 M Dyspnea >10 Colby [1989] (19) Surgery DOC several months later
19 51 M Cough >10 Colby [1989] (19) Surgery CDF 6 months after surgery
20 77 F Pneumonia <5 Colby [1989] (19) Surgery DOC 6 months postop
21 54 M Chest pain, paresthesia at upper extremity 10 Loose [1990] (20) Surgery, CT, RT CDF 7 months postop
22 45 F Chest pain 5.5 Loose [1990] (20) Surgery, CT CDF 2 months postop
23 70 M Asymptomatic 6 Petersen [1990] (21) Surgery, RT CDF 6 months after onset
24 59 M Influenza–like 11 Stark [1990] (22) Surgery
25 58 M Fever, cough 18 Bhalla [1992] (23) DOD 1 months after onset
26 72 M Miller (1993) (24) CT, RT DOD 12 months after onset
27 56 M Tingling in left fingertips 4 Sievert [2000] (25) Surgery CDF 12 months postop
28 33 F Cough, chest pain 5.5 Chapman [2001] (26) Surgery, CT CDF 42 months postop
29 74 F Asymptomatic 5.7 Magishi [2004] (27) Surgery DOD 11 months postop
30 72 M Dyspnea 9 Kadowaki [2005] (28) DOD 5 months after onset
31 77 M Back pain, limb edema, hemosputum 11 Kadowaki [2005] (28) DOD 3 months after onset
32 72 M Dyspnea 30 Miimi [2008] (29) DOD 7 months after onset
33 58 F Asymptomatic 2.5 Karfis [2010] (30) Surgery, CT, RT CDF 6 months postop
Pleural (n=14) 34 61 M Chest pain, cough, hemoptysis, weight loss Cohn [1968] (31) Surgery DOD shortly postop
35 66 M Pearson [1969] (32) Surgery DOD 5 months after onset
36 73 F Pearson [1969] (32) Surgery DOD 6 months postop
37 93 M Asymptomatic 4 Connolly [1991] (33) DOD 24 months
38 72 M Meeus [1994] (34)
39 73 M Chest pain, hemoptysis 4.5 Sabloff [2003] (35) Surgery
40 76 M Breathlessness Chandak [2007] (36) Biopsy
41 74 M Cough, breathless 11.3 Matono [2008] (37)
42 64 M cough 13.1 Kasagi [2009] (38) Surgery, RT
43 47 M Dyspnea 10.9 Wang [2010] (39)
44 77 M Asymptomatic 4 Tokue [2011] (40) Surgery DOD 24 months postop
45 67 M Dyspnea on exertion, cough 12 Shiota [2013] (41) Surgery, CT DOD 24 months postop
46 37 F Flank pain, dyspnea 8 Lee [2014] (42) Surgery, CT CDF 14 months postop
47 75 F Chest pain, hemoptysis 8.2 Rapicetta [2017] (43)
Chest wall (n=9) 48 14 F Back pain, cough, dyspnea Stauss [1951] (44) DOD 7 months
49 59 M Hoffmann [1966] (45) Surgery
50 53 F Das Gupta [1968] (46) Surgery DOD 46 months postop
51 41 F Lump 3 Alpert [1973] (47) Excisional biopsy CDF 12 months after onset
52 57 F 9 Lee [1995] (3) RT CDF 100 months
53 40 M Vision blurring Kelkar [2010] (48) RT CDF 6 months
54 30 M Shoulder immobilisation 30 Sabatier [2010] (49) CT DOD 60 months after onset; 12 months after diagnosis
55 76 M Nystrom [2016] (50) Surgery DOD 9 months
56 58 M 17 Nystrom [2016] (50) CT, RT DOD 12 months
Chest (not specified) (n=4) 57 47 M Torigoe [2007] (2) CT DOD 28 months
58 25 M Torigoe [2007] (2) CT CDF 70 months
59 39 M Torigoe [2007] (2) CT, RT CDF 68 months
60 76 M Torigoe [2007] (2) RT DOD 6 months

CT, chemotherapy; RT, radiotherapy; DOD, dead of disease; CDF, continuous disease-free; DOC, dead of other causes; DUC, dead of unknown causes.

The patient characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The median age of the 60 patients was 60 years (range, 14–93 years). A majority of the cases involved males (65%, 39/60 cases), which is similar to previously reported case series (30). The tumors were usually large with a median size of 8.2 cm (range, 2.5–30 cm).

In the cases collected here, some patients had a previous history of radiation exposure, chemotherapy, asbestos exposure, pulmonary tuberculosis or traumatic hemothorax (2,7,10,11,35,41,47). The patient in the case study reported here was previously exposed to aluminum dust. It was speculated that pulmonary inflammation caused by the aforementioned factors might mediate tumorigenesis.

The most common manifestation is respiratory related symptoms caused by compression or invasion of surrounding structures such as cough, dyspnea or chest pain. Some patients were asymptomatic.

Diagnosis

The intrathoracic ESOS usually grows into a large tumor because initial symptoms are often non-specific. Ossification accompanied by malignant features on the chest CT scan is strongly suggestive of an osteosarcoma although a few exceptions were reported (38,40).

A definitive diagnosis was confirmed histopathologically. ESOS usually has a uniform sarcomatous pattern and produces osteoid. The criteria for the diagnosis of primary ESOS are as follows: the presence of a uniform morphological pattern of sarcomatous tissue that excludes the possibility of malignant mesenchymoma, the production of malignant osteoid or bone by the sarcoma and a primary osseous tumor is excluded (51).

The histopathologic features of ESOS are the same as those originating from the skeletal system, including osteoblastic, fibroblastic, and chondroblastic subtypes. Small cell, giant cell, and telangiectatic subtypes occur less often. The immunophenotype of ESOS is also similar to osteosarcoma of the bone. CD99 is expressed in all types of osteosarcoma. ALP staining is positive and osteocalcin is the most specific antigen for ESOS. ESOSs are uniformly positive for vimentin, with some cases expressing smooth muscle actin, desmin, S-100 protein, EMA and keratin (52).

Treatment and prognosis

The outcome for patients with primary thoracic ESOS remains poor. The majority of patients died within months because of rapid disease progression. The overall 1-, 2- and 5-year survival was merely 41.8%, 31.3% and 22.3%, respectively (Figure 3A). The median follow-up time was 7 months (range, 1–100 months) and the median overall survival was 11 months (95% CI: 8.1–13.9).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

(A) Overall survival of all 60 cases of intrathoracic ESOS; (B) survival curves of ESOS patients with different originating sites. The median overall survival for patients with intrathoracic ESOS was 11 months (95% CI: 8.1–13.9) and the 5-year overall survival was 22.3%. ESOS in the mediastinum and lung had a significantly worse overall survival compared with that located in the chest wall or pleural (log-rank P=0.0443).

The median overall survival for ESOS in the mediastinum, lung and other locations was 4.0 (1.3–6.7), 10.0 (5.3–14.7) and 24 (10.7–37.3) months, respectively. Comparing with ESOS located in the chest wall or pleura, ESOS in the mediastinum and lung had a significantly worse overall survival (log-rank P=0.0443; Figure 3B).

It is noteworthy that ESOS can be further classified into either low or high-grade. While the majority of published cases had high-grade histological features of marked cellular atypia, extensive areas of necrosis and atypical mitotic figures, Yu et al. reported a case of low-grade mediastinal ESOS characterized by mild cytological atypia. The low-grade ESOS had a slow progression and the patient demonstrated long-term survival after resection (12).

Little is known about the factors affecting the survival of ESOS patients (51). Complete surgical resection is the optimal treatment to improve survival (9). Chemotherapy is also advisable, especially for those without surgical indication (2). In ESOS of the pleura, tumor size was considered as a major predictor of survival (4). Among the 57 cases with documented treatment in this series, 53% (n=30) had surgery, 26% (n=15) received chemotherapy and 19% (n=11) received radiation therapy. The chemotherapy regimens included doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, cisplatin, or methotrexate (10,12). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that surgical treatment, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were three independent favorable prognostic factors for survival in ESOS patients (Table 2).

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors of survival.

Characteristic Univariate analysis P Multivariate analysis
HR 95% CI P value
Sex 0.523
Age (years) 0.036 1.027 0.989–1.027 0.423
Site 0.275
Tumor size 0.112
Surgery 0.107 0.297 0.137–0.660 0.003
Chemotherapy 0.050 0.297 0.120–0.732 0.008
Radiotherapy 0.055 0.236 0.069–0.811 0.022

Indicators with P value less than 0.2 by univariate analysis were included in the multivariate analysis.

Despite complete resection, local recurrence occurred in 22% (2/9) of post-operative cases with well documented follow-up records. In addition, metastases occurred in 66% (6/9) of post-operative patients. The most common site of metastasis was the lung (55%, 5/9) and the kidney, brain or adrenal glands were other involved metastatic sites.

Conclusions

Primary thoracic ESOS is a rare but aggressive tumor associated with a very poor prognosis. Most ESOS cases are asymptomatic in the early stages and difficult to diagnose through small sample biopsies. Physicians should be aware of ESOS as a possibility, especially when calcification is present in CT images. Histologically, osteoid and bone production is a typical characteristic of ESOS and immunohistochemistry serves as a diagnostic aid. If considered as a primary tumor, surgical resection is the primary choice and chemotherapy and radiotherapy are considered as effective.

Acknowledgements

None.

Informed Consent: Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this manuscript and any accompanying images.

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

References

  • 1.Rosenberg AE HS. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma. In Fletcher CD, Unni KK, Mertens F, editors, Pathology and Genetics of Tumours of Soft Tissue and Bone. Lyon: IARC press, 2002;182-3. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Torigoe T, Yazawa Y, Takagi T, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma in Japan: multiinstitutional study of 20 patients from the Japanese Musculoskeletal Oncology Group. J Orthop Sci 2007;12:424-9. 10.1007/s00776-007-1164-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lee JS, Fetsch JF, Wasdhal DA, et al. A review of 40 patients with extraskeletal osteosarcoma. Cancer 1995;76:2253-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bane BL, Evans HL, Ro JY, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma. A clinicopathologic review of 26 cases. Cancer 1990;65:2762-70. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wilson H. Extraskeletal ossifying tumors. Ann Surg 1941;113:95-112. 10.1097/00000658-194101000-00013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Ikeda T, Ishihara T, Yoshimatsu H, et al. Primary osteogenic sarcoma of the mediastinum. Thorax 1974;29:582-8. 10.1136/thx.29.5.582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Catanese J, Dutcher JP, Dorfman HD, et al. Mediastinal osteosarcoma with extension to lungs in a patient treated for Hodgkin's disease. Cancer 1988;62:2252-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Greenwood SM, Meschter SC. Extraskeletal osteogenic sarcoma of the mediastinum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989;113:430-3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Burt M, Ihde JK, Hajdu SI, et al. Primary sarcomas of the mediastinum: results of therapy. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1998;115:671-80. 10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70333-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Ulusakarya A, Terrier P, Regnard JF, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma of the mediastinum after treatment of a mediastinal germ-cell tumor. Am J Clin Oncol 1999;22:609-14. 10.1097/00000421-199912000-00013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Hishida T, Yoshida J, Nishimura M, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma arising in anterior mediastinum: brief report with a review of the literature. J Thorac Oncol 2009;4:927-9. 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3181a52c63 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Yu H, Wu Z, Cui Y, et al. Low-grade extraskeletal osteosarcoma of the mediastinum: report of a case and review of literature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol 2015;8:3279-81. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Greenspan EB. Primary osteoid chondrosarcoma of the lung: report of a case. Am J Cancer 1933;18:603-9. [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Yamashita T, Kiyota T, Ukishima G, et al. Autopsy case of chondro-osteoidsarcoma originating in the lung. Showa Igakkai Zasshi 1964;23:472-3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Nosanchuk JS, Weatherbee L. Primary osteogenic sarcoma in lung. Report of a case. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1969;58:242-7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Reingold IM, Amromin GD. Extraosseous osteosarcoma of the lung. Cancer 1971;28:491-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bagarić I, Belicza M. Extraskeletal osteogenic sarcoma of the lungs. Lijec Vjesn 1982;104:467-70. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Nascimento AG, Unni KK, Bernatz PE. Sarcomas of the lung. Mayo Clin Proc 1982;57:355-9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Colby TV, Bilbao JE, Battifora H, et al. Primary osteosarcoma of the lung. A reappraisal following immunohistologic study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1989;113:1147-50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Loose JH, el-Naggar AK, Ro JY, et al. Primary osteosarcoma of the lung. Report of two cases and review of the literature. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1990;100:867-73. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Petersen M. Radionuclide detection of primary pulmonary osteogenic sarcoma: a case report and review of the literature. J Nucl Med 1990;31:1110-4. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Stark P, Smith DC, Watkins GE, et al. Primary intrathoracic extraosseous osteogenic sarcoma: report of three cases. Radiology 1990;174:725-6. 10.1148/radiology.174.3.2305056 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Bhalla M, Thompson BG, Harley RA, et al. Primary extraosseous pulmonary osteogenic sarcoma: CT findings. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1992;16:974-6. 10.1097/00004728-199211000-00027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miller DL, Allen MS. Rare pulmonary neoplasms. Mayo Clin Proc 1993;68:492-8. 10.1016/S0025-6196(12)60199-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sievert LJ, Elwing TJ, Evans ML. Primary pulmonary osteogenic sarcoma. Skeletal Radiol 2000;29:283-5. 10.1007/s002560050609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Chapman AD, Pritchard SC, Yap WW, et al. Primary pulmonary osteosarcoma: case report and molecular analysis. Cancer 2001;91:779-84. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Magishi K, Yoshida H, Izumi Y, et al. Primary osteosarcoma of the lung: report of a case. Surg Today 2004;34:150-2. 10.1007/s00595-003-2651-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kadowaki T, Hamada H, Yokoyama A, et al. Two cases of primary pulmonary osteosarcoma. Intern Med 2005;44:632-7. 10.2169/internalmedicine.44.632 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Niimi R, Matsumine A, Kusuzaki K, et al. Primary osteosarcoma of the lung: a case report and review of the literature. Med Oncol 2008;25:251-5. 10.1007/s12032-007-9022-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Karfis EA, Karaiskos T, Cheva A, et al. Primary extraosseous osteosarcoma of the lung. Acta Oncol 2010;49:114-6. 10.3109/02841860902953864 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cohn L, Hall AD. Extraosseous osteogenic sarcoma of the pleura. Ann Thorac Surg 1968;5:545-9. 10.1016/S0003-4975(10)65974-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Pearson KD, Rubin D, Szemes GC, et al. Extraosseous osteogenic sarcoma of the chest. Br J Dis Chest 1969;63:231-4. 10.1016/S0007-0971(69)80024-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Connolly JP, McGuyer CA, Sageman WS, et al. Intrathoracic osteosarcoma diagnosed by CT scan and pleural biopsy. Chest 1991;100:265-7. 10.1378/chest.100.1.265 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Meeus I, Galdermans D, Roland J, et al. Spectacular bone scintigraphy and transverse SPECT images in primary osteosarcoma of the pleura. Clin Nucl Med 1994;19:738-40. 10.1097/00003072-199408000-00020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sabloff B, Munden RF, Melhem AI, et al. Radiologic-pathologic conferences of the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center: Extraskeletal osteosarcoma of the pleura. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:972. 10.2214/ajr.180.4.1800972 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Chandak P, Hunt I, Rawlins R, et al. Bone or pleura? Primary pleural osteosarcoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2007;133:587-8. 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2006.09.050 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Matono R, Maruyama R, Ide S, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma of the pleura: a case report. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2008;56:180-2. 10.1007/s11748-007-0216-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Kasagi Y, Yamazaki K, Nakashima A, et al. Chondroblastic osteosarcoma arising from the pleura: report of a case. Surg Today 2009;39:1064-7. 10.1007/s00595-009-3995-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang W, Quan CB, Li N, et al. Diagnosis of pleural cavity extraskeletal osteosarcoma: a case report and literature review. Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi 2010;33:202-5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Tokue H, Tsushima Y, Endo K. Computed tomography findings of the progress of calcification in extraskeletal osteosarcoma without calcification derived from the pleura. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;59:447-50. 10.1007/s11748-010-0701-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Shiota H, Yasukawa T, Hirai A, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma of the pleura:report of a case. Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;19:297-301. 10.5761/atcs.cr.12.01964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Lee CH, Park CR, Kim JW, et al. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma arising from the pleura. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2014;47:320-4. 10.5090/kjtcs.2014.47.3.320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Rapicetta C, Lococo F, Carlinfante G, et al. Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma Arising from the Pleura. Lung 2017;195:523-5. 10.1007/s00408-017-0018-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Stauss HK. Osteogenic sarcoma arising in traumatic hemothorax and hematoma of the thoracic wall. Surgery 1951;29:917-28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Hoffmann K, Fine G, Ponka JL, et al. Extraskeletal osteogenic sarcoma--case report. Henry Ford Hosp Med J 1966;14:381-6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Das Gupta TK, Hajdu SI, Foote FW., Jr Extraosseous osteogenic sarcoma. Ann Surg 1968;168:1011-22. 10.1097/00000658-196812000-00011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Alpert LI, Abaci IF, Werthamer S. Radiation-induced extraskeletal osteosarcoma. Cancer 1973;31:1359-63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kelkar G, Moiyadi AV, Kane SV. Extraskeletal osteosarcoma of the chest-wall with delayed metastasis to the sphenoid. Indian J Cancer 2010;47:82-4. 10.4103/0019-509X.58872 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Sabatier R, Bouvier C, de Pinieux G, et al. Low-grade extraskeletal osteosarcoma of the chest wall: case report and review of literature. BMC Cancer 2010;10:645. 10.1186/1471-2407-10-645 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Nystrom LM, Reimer NB, Reith JD, et al. The Treatment and Outcomes of Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma: Institutional Experience and Review of The Literature. Iowa Orthop J 2016;36:98-103. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Allan CJ, Soule EH. Osteogenic sarcoma of the somatic soft tissues. Clinicopathologic study of 26 cases and review of literature. Cancer 1971;27:1121-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mavrogenis AF, Papagelopoulos PJ. Soft Tissue Tumors: Extraskeletal osteosarcoma. Atlas Genet Cytogenet Oncol Haematol 2014;18:443-6. [Google Scholar]

Articles from Journal of Thoracic Disease are provided here courtesy of AME Publications

RESOURCES