Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 3;11:13–20. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S147413

Table 3.

Patient evaluation of treatment outcome

Patient satisfaction Er:YAG laser + HQ, n (%) HQ, n (%)
Excellent 10 (33.3) 5 (16.7)
Good 12 (40) 7 (23.3)
Fair 7 (23.3) 14 (46.7)
Poor 1 (3.3) 4 (13.3)

Abbreviations: Er:YAG, erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet; HQ, hydroquinone.