Skip to main content
. 2017 Nov 30;19(1):102–117. doi: 10.15252/embr.201744188

Figure 4. Brat directly targets the 3′UTR of zld via a specific binding motif.

Figure 4

  • A
    qPCR analysis of zldRB transcript after Brat‐RIP of control and brat K06028 mutant larval brain tissue. Left diagram represents zldRB RNA levels of the Input. Right diagram represents zldRB RNA levels after Brat‐RIP experiment.
  • B
    Schematic representation of zldRB locus and the zldRB 3′UTR fragments used in this study. Sites of the Brat‐binding motif within the zldRB 3′UTR are highlighted. Fragments which bind to Brat‐NHL are labeled in green; non‐binding fragments in black. Nucleotide mutations and deletions are marked in red.
  • C, D
    Recombinant Brat‐NHL was incubated with 32P‐labeled wild‐type (C) or mutated (D) zld RNA fragments as indicated and analyzed by native gel electrophoresis. Note that mutations of the Brat‐binding sites in the zldRB 3′UTR greatly impair RNA binding of Brat‐NHL.
  • E
    Drosophila S2 cells were cotransfected with GFP‐zldRB 3′UTR reporters as indicated together with full‐length Brat. RFP was used as a transfection control; LacZ was used as an overexpression control. Note that repression of GFP‐zldRB 3′UTR reporter bearing all Brat‐binding site mutations is greatly reduced.
Data information: Pictures and blots are representative of three independent experiments. Error bars represent standard deviation. Statistical analysis was done using t‐test. *P < 0.05; ***P < 0.001.