Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep 16;2:708–717. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2016.09.007

Table 1.

Characteristics of participants for the overall sample and stratified by sex/gender. Results reported in means (SD) unless otherwise specified.

Variable Overall sample (n=1724) Men (n=807) Women (n=917) P-value* (difference - women/men)

Age (years) 69.1 (2.9) 69.1 (2.9) 69.0 (2.8) 0.678
Resilience score 80.8 (11.4) 81.3 (11.0) 80.3 (11.7) <0.096
Income sufficiency n (%) 967 (56.5%) 472 (58.8%) 495 (54.5%) 0.070
Childhood economic adversities 0.226
0 917 (53.3%) 408 (50.6%) 509 (55.6%)
1 479 (27.8%) 239 (29.6%) 240 (26.2%)
2 225 (13.1%) 109 (13.5%) 116 (12.7%)
3 101 (5.87%) 50 (6.3%) 51 (5.5%)
Childhood social adversities 0.009
0 1323 (76.8%) 635 (78.8%) 688 (75.1%)
1 246 (14.3%) 115 (14.3%) 131 (14.3%)
2 113 (6.6%) 47 (5.8%) 66 (7.2%)
3 40 (2.3%) 9 (1.1%) 31 (3.4%)
Social support from friends n(%) <0.001
No friends 314 (18.4%) 160 (19.8%) 154 (17.1%)
Low support 378 (22.0%) 213 (26.7%) 165 (18.0%)
High support 1024 (59.6%) 430 (53.5%) 594 (64.9%)
Social support from children n(%) 0.229
No children 154 (8.9%) 63 (9.0%) 91 (10.2%)
Low support 429 (25.0%) 210 (25.8%) 219 (23.8%)
High support 1136 (66.1%) 533 (66.2%) 603 (66.0%)
Social support from partner n(%) <0.001
No partner 581 (34.2%) 134 (16.6%) 447 (49.0%)
Low support 349 (19.7%) 178 (22.1%) 171 (18.5%)
High support 793 (46.1%) 495 (62.3%) 298 (32.5%)
Social engagement Median (quartile range) 1 (2) 1 (1) 1 (2) <0.001

Income sufficiency was dichotomized by whether income meets needs or not; social support from friends, children, and partner variables were measured using IMIAS-Social Networks and Social Support. Social engagement score ranges from 0 to 3. *Significance tested between women and men using t-test for continuous variables, median non-parametric test for medians, and chi-square for categorical variables.