Table 4.
Social network characteristics and durability of effects of an intervention to reduce soda consumption among Latinos in Philadelphia.
| Scenario 1 | Scenario 4 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model Parameters | ||||||||
| Homophily Pref. | 0 | 25 | ||||||
| Clustering Pref. | 0 | 25 | ||||||
| Family Influence | Yes | Yes | ||||||
| Intervention Type | Intervention Type | |||||||
| R/NF | R/F | N/NF | N/F | R/NF | R/F | N/NF | N/F | |
| Weekly Soda Consumption | ||||||||
| Pre-Intervention | 3.51 | 3.55 | 3.42 | 3.52 | 3.58 | 3.61 | 3.53 | 3.58 |
| Post-Intervention | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.94 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
| End | 3.19 | 3.21 | 3.14 | 3.14 | 3.24 | 3.14 | 3.00 | 3.08 |
Notes: Pre-intervention is at time step 490; post-intervention is at 511; end is at 1001. R=randomly-targeted intervention; N=network-based intervention; NF=no food environment intervention; F=food environment intervention.