Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Res Comput Mol Biol. 2017 Apr 12;10229:99–116. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56970-3_7

Fig. 4. Malaria data.

Fig. 4

A Partial calibration: the mean number of target discoveries in the malaria dataset increases with the number of calibrating decoys. B a-TDC is less variable than TDC: the 0.05 and 0.95 quantiles of the number of a-TDC / TDC discoveries are compared (scores are calibrated using all 10K calibrating decoys). C Using PC a-TDC can have more power than TDC: plotted are the log of the ratios of the 0.05, 0.5 and 0.95 quantiles of the number of a-TDC (10 competing decoys) discoveries over the corresponding numbers for TDC discoveries. A-C All quantiles are taken with respect to 2000 randomly drawn sets of competing decoys, as described in Supp. Sec. 1.4.