Table 4.
Direct and Indirect Effect of Negative Emotions on Quit Attempts, 5,439 smokers, by Country
Australia (N = 1,127 smokers) |
Canada (N = 1,290 smokers) |
Mexico (N = 1,392 smokers) |
US (N = 1,630 smokers) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|
Total Indirect effect | 0.12*** | 0.12*** | 0.09*** | 0.13*** |
Attention | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.02 |
Risk concern | 0.00 | 0.03 | −0.02 | 0.03 |
Avoiding | 0.02* | 0.03** | 0.01 | 0.05*** |
Forgoing | 0.10*** | 0.06*** | 0.08*** | 0.04* |
Direct effect | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.10** | 0.06 |
Total effect | 0.14*** | 0.12*** | 0.19*** | 0.19*** |
p<0.05,
p<0.01,
p<0.001.
Note: All figures are coefficients controlling for socio-demographics, smoking-related outcomes, self-efficacy, heaviness of smoking index, the number of survey participated, and survey wave. Direct effect indicates the unmediated effect of negative emotions on quit attempts adjusting for a mediator, while indirect effect indicates the effect of negative emotions on quit attempts mediated by a mediator. Total effect is the sum of the direct effect and the indirect effect.