Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Perspect Psychol Sci. 2017 Dec 12;13(1):101–122. doi: 10.1177/1745691617722620

Table 2.

School Discipline Interventions

Common features of traditional interventions
(e.g., zero-tolerance)
An approach that increases displays of respect from authorities
What they say
  • We have zero tolerance for misbehavior

  • Any misbehavior will be met with harsh punishment

  • Punishments for repeat offenses will escalate

  • There is the high standard for behavior and achievement here; • We believe you have the potential to meet this standard

  • If you make mistakes, it’s part of the learning process

  • Here is how we plan to support you as we work together to meet this high standard

How they say it
  • Clearly communicating prohibitions (e.g. “no fighting” signs on the walls)

  • Systems for accounting for bad behavior (e.g., demerit systems, token economies)

  • Vigilant supervision by in-school police officers, hall monitors, etc.

  • Creating a context of respect with multiple adults, in which adults know students’ core values and are empathic about underlying causes of behavior

  • Procedural justice: fair application of rules

  • Opportunities to learn and grow after mistakes

Note: Common features of zero tolerance interventions abridged from published descriptions of programs (American Psychological Association Zero Tolerance Task Force, 2008; Heitzeg, 2009)