Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 4;8:2207. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02207

Table 4.

Most frequent reasons provided by the uninstructed participants in Experiment 2 to explain their truth and lie judgments.

Cue categories and individual cues Kappa Total percentage Truth Judgments (percentage) Lie judgments (percentage) Significance of McNemar test
CONSISTENCY/INCONSISTENCY ACROSS INTERVIEWS
Consistency across interviews 0.94 45.45 40.91 4.55 0.021
Inconsistency across interviews 0.85 36.36 0.00 36.36 0.008
CONFIDENCE/DOUBTS AND LACK OF CONFIDENCE
Doubts or lack of confidence 1.00 27.27 0.00 27.27 0.031
DETAILS OR KNOWLEDGE
Detailed or precise answers 0.91 31.82 31.82 0.00 0.016
Lack of knowledge 0.62 40.91 9.09 36.36 0.070
UNDEFINED CONSISTENCY/INCONSISTENCY
Undefined consistency 0.81 31.82 31.82 0.00 0.016
Undefined inconsistency 0.81 27.27 0.00 27.27 0.031