Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 9.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Neurosci. 2017 Jun 19;20(8):1052–1061. doi: 10.1038/nn.4587

Table 1. Genome-wide survival analysis of Alzheimer’s Disease.

(a) Description of Consortia samples with available phenotype and genotype data included in the genome-wide survival analysis. AAO: age at onset. AAE: age at last examination. (b) Summary of loci with significant (P < 5×10−8) or suggestive (P < 1×10−5) associations from the genome-wide survival analysis.

a

Cases Controls

Dataset N Percent
women
Mean AAO yrs
(s.d.)
N Percent
women
Mean AAE yrs
(s.d.)
ADGC 8617 58.9 74.2 (8.1) 9765 60.1 77.1 (8.4)
GERAD 2615 63.4 73.0 (8.5) 1148 62.1 76.5 (7.0)
EADI case-control study 1420 67.2 72.1 (7.1) 878 61 72.2 (7.8)
EADI longitudinal study 387 61.8 81.3 (5.6) 5416 61.1 79.3 (5.3)
CHARGE FHS 229 65.5 85.7 (6.3) 1979 54.1 80.7 (7.5)
CHARGE CHS 374 69.2 82.2 (5.0) 1675 60.6 81.1 (5.2)
CHARGE Rotterdam 764 73.2 83.1 (6.6) 4988 57.8 81.4 (6.9)
Total 14406 61.7 74.8 25849 59.6 79.0
b
SNP Major/minor Alleles MAF CHRa BP Closest Gene Logistic ORb Logistic
P value
Survival HR
(95% CI)c
Survival
P value
Heterogeneity
P value
Previously reported associated loci
rs2093761 G/A 0.2019 1 207786542 CR1 1.16 (1.12–1.20) 2.6×10−14 1.07 (1.04–1.10) 1.2×10−6 0.25
rs6431219 C/T 0.4163 2 127862133 BIN1 1.12 (1.09–1.15) 7.6×10−13 1.08 (1.06–1.10) 3.9×10−10 0.16
rs1057233 A/G 0.3194 11 47376448 SPI1/CELF1d 0.93 (0.89–0.96) 5.4×10−6 0.94 (0.91–.97) 8.4×10−6 0.86
rs7930318 T/C 0.4004 11 60033371 MS4A 0.90 (0.87–0.93) 5.1×10−11 0.93 (0.90–.95) 2.3×10−9 0.6
rs567075 C/T 0.3097 11 85830157 PICALM 0.88 (0.85–0.91) 4.3×10−14 0.91 (0.89–.94) 9.1×10−12 0.74
rs9665907 G/A 0.1133 11 121435470 SORL1 0.88 (0.83–0.93) 1.8×10−7 0.92 (0.88–.95) 5.5×10−6 0.96
rs17125944 T/C 0.0924 14 53400629 FERMT2 1.13 (1.08–1.18) 1.0×10−5 1.10 (1.06–1.14) 2.3×10−6 0.31
rs4803758 G/T 0.3551 19 45327423 APOEe 1.33 (1.30–1.37) 1.2×10−67 1.21 (1.18–1.23) 7.8×10−52 0.32
Novel loci reaching suggestive significance
rs10919252 C/G 0.3275 1 169802956 C1orf112 1.04 (1.01–1.08) 1.1×10−2 1.10 (1.06–1.14) 8.2×10−7 0.92
rs1532244 A/G 0.0925 3 28057905 CMC1 0.95 (0.90–1.01) 6.9×10−2 0.86 (0.80–.93) 9.7×10−6 0.99
rs116341973 A/G 0.0227 3 63462893 SYNPR 1.20 (1.09–1.30) 5.4×10−4 1.23 (1.15–1.31) 2.5×10−7 0.62
rs71602496 A/G 0.1453 4 661002 PDE6B 1.02 (0.98–1.06) 3.6×10−1 1.08 (1.05–1.11) 5.0×10−6 0.11
rs1689013 T/C 0.2493 4 181048651 LINC00290 1.02 (0.98–1.06) 2.7×10−1 1.07 (1.04–1.09) 4.7×10−6 0.31
rs7445192 A/G 0.461 5 140138701 PCDHA1 NA NA 1.06 (1.03–1.08) 7.9×10−6 0.77
rs12207208 T/C 0.1034 6 40301379 LINC00951 1.07 (1.02–1.20) 1.2×10−2 1.09 (1.05–1.13) 6.8×10−6 0.78
rs17170228 G/A 0.0623 7 33076314 NT5C3A 1.07 (1.01–1.14) 2.5×10−2 1.13 (1.08–1.18) 1.0×10−6 0.94
rs2725066 A/T 0.4872 8 4438058 CSMD1 1.03 (1.00–1.06) 7.3×10−2 1.10 (1.06–1.14) 1.0×10−6 0.6
rs7867518 T/C 0.476 9 2527525 VLDLR 0.97 (0.94–1.00) 6.8×10−2 0.95 (0.92–.97) 9.1×10−6 0.79
rs1625716 T/G 0.0643 10 59960083 IPMK 0.87 (0.80–0.94) 1.0×10−4 0.88 (0.82–.94) 7.7×10−6 0.95
rs1118069 T/A 0.2805 12 84739181 SLC6A15 0.98 (0.94–1.01) 2.0×10−1 0.90 (0.86–.95) 2.7×10−6 0.8
rs11074412 A/G 0.2087 16 19833001 IQCK 0.94 (0.90–0.98) 1.9×10−3 0.93 (0.90–.96) 7.0×10−6 0.48
rs5750677 C/T 0.2885 22 39147715 SUN2 0.97 (0.93–1.00) 5.1×10−2 0.94 (0.91–.97) 5.2×10−6 0.51
a

Build 37, assembly hg19.

b

Summary statistics of the logistic regression were obtained from stage 1 of the IGAP GWAS.

c

Calculated with respect to the minor allele.

d

SPI1 is the nearest gene to rs1057233. The same locus was previously labeled as CELF1 in the 2013 IGAP GWAS paper1.

e

The nearest gene to rs4803758 is APOE.