Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 8;17:5. doi: 10.1186/s12939-017-0717-5

Table 3.

Comparison of means of selected districts (percentages of health workers knowing/applying the indigent and delivery directives)

DISTRICTS (1) Knowledge of indigent exemptions (%) N (2) Application of indigent exemptions (recoded)
(%)
N (3) Knowledge of delivery exemptions
(%)
N (4) Application of delivery exemptions (recoded) (%) N
Boromo 7.14 28 3.70 27 53.57* 28 53.57** 28
Nouna 30.30*** 132 21.49*** 121 50.00*** 134 43.28*** 134
Manga 6.67 30 3.45 29 3.33 30 3.33 30
Kaya 2.30 174 1.16 173 6.90*** 174 3.45*** 174
Kongoussi 1.19 84 0.00 83 16.87 83 15.66 83
Nanoro 9.52 21 0.00 19 61.90** 21 61.90** 21
Bousse 26.67** 45 17.07** 41 37.78 45 35.56 45
Gourcy 3.57 84 1.20 83 14.29 84 10.71 84
Batie 4.35 23 0.00 19 73.91*** 23 68.18*** 22
Diebougou 6.25 32 0.00 41 59.38** 32 59.38*** 32
All other districts 8.12 850 4.19 836 25.71 848 23.40 846
Total 9.18 1503 4.98 1472 26.96 1502 24.21 1499

Selected districts with positive and significant relationships with the dependent variables. Districts grouped in “other” were all those whose value deviated from the weighted average of the outcome indicators by no more than one point in either direction. Multiple comparison test applying Sidak correction. Comparison of means of specific district vs. category “all other districts”. Significance levels: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001