Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 28;16(3):276–289. doi: 10.1177/1534735416656915

Table 4.

Serum Levels of Glycemic and Insulinemic Biomarkers at Baseline Compartment of Study and 8 Weeks After the Intervention in Women With BC Who Received Onion (HO Group) Versus LO Consumers.

Variable LO (Placebo; n = 23), Mean ± SD HO (Intervention; n = 23), Mean ± SD Mean Differencea P valuea Absolute Treatment Effectb
Mean [95% CI] P Valuec
FBG (mg/dL)
 Predose 91.1 ± 16.0d 106.6 ± 21.2 +15.5 .008 −5.04 .245
 Week 8 100.6 ± 21.6 95.1 ± 13.6 −5.3 .313 [−3.58, 13.67]
 Mean difference +9.5e −11.5
P valuee .079 .014
Insulin (ng/mL)
 Predose 0.198 ± 0.006 0.196 ± 0.005 −0.002 .235 −0.006 .009
 Week 8 0.207 ± 0.018 0.197 ± 0.006 −0.010 .008 [−0.010, −0.002]
 Mean difference +0.009 +0.001
P value 0.123 0.523
HOMAIRf
 Predose 0.045 ± 0.01 0.052 ± 0.011 +0.007 .017 0.001 .655
 Week 8 0.051 ± 0.01 0.046 ± 0.006 −0.005 .080 [−0.003, 0.005]
 Mean difference +0.006 −0.005
P value .025 .021
HOMAβg
 Predose 226.1 ± 643.8 229.4 ± 188.6 3.2 .982 +19.64 .804
 Week 8 259.5 ± 140.4 295.5 ± 226.6 35.9 .521 [−138.8, 178.0]
 Mean difference +33.4 +66.1
P value .806 .207
QUICKIh
 Predose 0.90 ± 0.20 0.90 ± 0.18 0.01 .938 +0.063 .028
 Week 8 0.76 ± 0.14 0.89 ± 0.13 0.13 .002 [−0.004, 0.131]
 Mean difference −0.15 −0.011
P value .012 .801
C-peptide (ng/mL)
 Predose 2.07 ± 1.10 2.09 ± 0.91 0.02 .954 −0.27 .005
 Week 8 3.14 ± 2.17 2.59 ± 1.41 0.55 .314 [−0.965, 0.430]
 Mean difference +1.07 +0.50
P value .026 .096

Abbreviations: BC, breast cancer; LO, low onion group; HO, high onion group; FBG, fasting blood glucose.

a

Independent sample t test was used to compare between 2 interventional groups. The mean difference of between groups was calculated for variables at (endpoint) − (baseline).

b

Absolute treatment effect is an estimate of change from predose to follow-up in the HO group minus the absolute change from predose to follow-up in the LO group in a mixed model.

c

Repeated-measures ANOVA was carried out in the mixed model.

d

Data are expressed in geometric mean ± SD.

e

Paired t test was performed to compare within-group changes. The mean difference within groups was calculated from averages of variables at (postdose) − (week 8).

f

Homeostatic model assessment.

g

Assessment of β-cell functionality.

h

Quantitative insulin sensitivity check index.