Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 9.
Published in final edited form as: Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Sep 24;160(2):333–338. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-3992-8

Table 2.

Breast cancer-specific and overall mortality among patients undergoing nipple-sparing and non-nipple-sparing unilateral mastectomy in California, 1988–2013

Number of deaths Total person-years Age- and stage-adjusteda
Fully adjustedb,c
HR 95 % CI p value HR 95 % CI p value
Breast cancer-specific mortality
 1988–2013 diagnoses
  Non-nipple-sparing 25,948 1451,617 1.0a 1.0b
  Nipple-sparing 37 4553 0.67 0.49–0.93 0.02 0.71 0.51–0.98 0.04
 1996–2013 diagnoses
  Non-nipple-sparing 13,469 767,098 1.0a 1.0c
  Nipple-sparing 17 2518 0.61 0.38–0.98 0.04 0.86 0.52–1.42 0.55
Overall mortality
 1988–2013 diagnoses
  Non-nipple-sparing 62,784 1451,617 1.0a 1.0b
  Nipple-sparing 118 4553 0.91 0.76–1.09 0.31 0.92 0.76–1.12 0.41
 1996–2013 diagnoses
  Non-nipple-sparing 29,707 767,098 1.0a 1.0c
  Nipple-sparing 32 2518 0.59 0.42–0.83 0.003 0.74 0.50–1.08 0.12

n = 157,592 for 1988–2013; n = 106,181 for 1996–2013

a

Cox regression with time from diagnosis (days) as the time-scale; stratified by American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage (0, I, II, III); and adjusted for age at diagnosis

b

Cox regression with time from diagnosis (days) as the time-scale; stratified by AJCC stage (0, I, II, III) and histology (ductal, lobular or with lobular component, other); adjusted for age, race, tumor size, lymph node involvement, adjuvant treatment, neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), marital status, patient SES distribution of reporting hospital, National Cancer Institute-designated cancer center, and year of diagnosis; and adjusted for clustering by hospital

c

Same as the model in footnote b, but additionally adjusted for grade, estrogen and progesterone receptor status, and insurance status, which were not available before 1996