Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan;26(1):43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.09.010

Table I.

Summary of General Practice (GP) and individual participant characteristics at baseline by study group

GP Practice characteristics Intervention n = 4 Control n = 4
Practice size, mean (SD) 10,240 (9174.8) 6983 (2060.7)
Practice Index of Multiple Deprivation rank, median (IQR) 9165.0 (2195.7, 19,478.5) 14,633.5 (4571.5, 28,822.0)
Number of General Practitioners, mean (SD) 6.0 (6.1) 5.5 (2.9)
Age (years) of GP, mean (SD) 42.2 (23.7) 42.8 (23.5)
Participants characteristics Intervention n = 288 Control n = 237
Gender, n (%)
 Female 167 (58.0) 146 (61.6)
 Male 121 (42.0) 91 (38.4)
Age (years) mean (SD) 66.9 (10.6) 67.7 (10.3)
BMI (kg m−2), mean (SD) 28.1 (5.1) 28.5 (4.8)
Marital status, n (%)
 Married 186 (65.0) 168 (71.0)
 Separated 2 (0.7) 4 (1.7)
 Divorced 29 (10.1) 13 (15.6)
 Widowed 44 (15.4) 37 (15.6)
 Cohabiting 10 (3.5) 9 (3.8)
 Single 15 (5.2) 6 (2.5)
Employment status, n (%)
 Employed 77 (27.2) 59 (25.2)
 Not working/retired 206 (72.8) 175 (74.8)
Deprivation index
 Median (IQR) 21,868 (15,144, 28,649) 20,182 (15,989, 24,635)
No. of pain sites, n (%)
 1 55 (19.1) 45 (19.0)
 2 or more 233 (80.9) 192 (81.0)

Age and gender structure of the registered population at the practices was similar to that of North Staffordshire and of England and Wales. Practices had a range of numbers of patients, a range of areas – semi rural to urban (small town/larger city), and a range of deprivation.