Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec;3(4):679–688. doi: 10.21037/jss.2017.11.03

Table 1. Baseline characteristics of studies comparing CBT and PS.

First author Total Pts Average age (years) Sex (%) Diagnosis Level involvement Avg F/U
Overall P Total (M) Total (F) P L1–L2 L2–L3 L3–L4 L4–L5 L4–S1 L5–L6 L5–S1
Chen 33 56 0.12 39.4 60.6 0.01 Lumbar degenerative disease Immediate (24–72 hrs)
Short-term (6–12 weeks)
Long-term (6–8 months)
Chin 60 58 0.61 55 45 0.49 Multi lumbar disk 2 years
Kasukawa 26 67 11 15 Spondylolisthesis Y Y Y CBT-TLIF 8 months
M-TLIF 16 months
P-TLIF 13 months
Kojima 222 66 49.5 50.5 Lumbar degenerative
Mori 32 Spondylolisthesis Preoperative
Post-operative (1 month)
Latest F/U (24 months)
Ninomiya 21 0.83 0.53 Spondylolisthesis Y Y Preoperative
Immediately post-op
6 months
12 months
Orita 40 63.6 >0.05 57.5 42.5 Spondylolisthesis Y Y CBT: 12.8+/-3.2 months
PS: 17.8+/-5.5 months
Sakaura 177 46 54 Spondylolisthesis Y Y Y Y Y Y CBT: 35 months
PS: 40 months
Takenaka 119 0.997 49 70 Spondylolisthesis Y Y Y Y Y Y 12 months

CBT, cortical bone trajectory; PS, pedicle screw; Pts, patients; Avg F/U, average follow-up; Y, yes; TLIF, transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.