Table 1.
Assessment of need Mean (SD) (95% CI) |
Difference in assessors Mean (95% CI) |
||
---|---|---|---|
Assessor | Young person | Parent | Young person–parent |
n | 168 | 168 | |
Total needs | 4.29 (3.05) (3.83–4.75) |
7.21 (4.19) (6.58–7.85) |
2.92 (df = 167, t = 11.922*) (2.44–3.41) |
Met needs | 2.72 (2.42) (2.36–3.09) |
4.35 (3.09) (3.88–4.82) |
1.63 (df = 167, t = 9.060*) (1.28–1.99) |
Unmet needs | 1.57 (1.88) (1.29–1.86) |
2.86 (2.76) (2.45–3.28) |
1.29 (df = 167, t = 6.902*) (0.92–1.66) |
A significant interaction effect between assessor and diagnostic group was found (F = 14.567, df = 1, 166; p < 0.001) however this result were not significant when total need was added as a covariate
T-test, 2 tailed, *p < 0.0001