Skip to main content
. 2017 Sep 11;48(1):83–91. doi: 10.1007/s10803-017-3295-x

Table 1.

Mean total number of needs, met needs and unmet needs, and difference between assessors

Assessment of need
Mean (SD) (95% CI)
Difference in assessors
Mean (95% CI)
Assessor Young person Parent Young person–parent
n 168 168
Total needs 4.29 (3.05)
(3.83–4.75)
7.21 (4.19)
(6.58–7.85)
2.92 (df = 167, t = 11.922*)
(2.44–3.41)
Met needs 2.72 (2.42)
(2.36–3.09)
4.35 (3.09)
(3.88–4.82)
1.63 (df = 167, t = 9.060*)
(1.28–1.99)
Unmet needs 1.57 (1.88)
(1.29–1.86)
2.86 (2.76)
(2.45–3.28)
1.29 (df = 167, t = 6.902*)
(0.92–1.66)

A significant interaction effect between assessor and diagnostic group was found (F = 14.567, df = 1, 166; p < 0.001) however this result were not significant when total need was added as a covariate

T-test, 2 tailed, *p < 0.0001