Table 3.
Study outcomes | Curamin | Placebo | Curamed | Intergroup comparison, mean difference or difference in rank sum$ and p values | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Placebo vs Curamin | Placebo vs Curamed | ||||
WOMAC osteoarthritis total Index | 7.38 ± 10.02* | 2.26 ± 10.39 | 6.34 ± 11.38 | −5.12 | −4.08 |
−24.84 $ | −17.18 $ | ||||
ES | 0.50 | 0.37 | P < 0.05* | P > 0.05 | |
WOMAC joint pain index | 2.02 ± 2.93* | 0.69 ± 2.70 | 1.86 ± 2.95 | −1.32 | −1.167 |
P < 0.05* | P > 0.05 | ||||
ES | 0.47 | 0.41 | |||
WOMAC morning stiffness index | 0.46 ± 1.35 | 0.14 ± 1.58 | 0.40 ± 1.54 | −12.43 $ | −9.12 $ |
P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | ||||
ES | 0.22 | 0.17 | |||
WOMAC limitation of physical function index | 4.61 ± 6.66 | 1.34 ± 7.01 | 3.83 ± 7.56 | −3.27 | −2.49 |
P > 0.05 | P > 0.05 | ||||
ES | 0.48 | 0.34 | |||
Chair Stand Test Score | 1.74 ± 2.18* | 0.44 ± 2.91 | 1.87 ± 2.41** | 1.30 | 1.44 |
P < 0.05* | P < 0.01** | ||||
ES | 0.51 | 0.53 | |||
Fast Paced Walk Test Speed, m/s. | 0.10 ± 0.18** | 0.01 ± 0.22 | 0.08 ± 0.05* | 0.12 | 0.10 |
P < 0.01** | P < 0.05* | ||||
ES | 0.45 | 0.44 | |||
Time up and go test, sec. | 1.56 ± 2.04** | 0.17 ± 0.84 | 0.78 ± 1.98 | −1.39 | −0.59 |
P < 0.01** | P > 0.05 | ||||
ES | 0.89 | 0.40 | |||
Stair Climb Test, sec. | 2.03 ± 3.60** | 0.22 ± 2.84 | 1.66 ± 2.37 | −1.82 | −0.95 |
P < 0.01** | P > 0.05 | ||||
ES | 0.56 | 0.55 | |||
Blood test 1: ESR | −2.75 ± 0.77 | −4.98 ± 0.85 | −4.12 ± 0.88 | 16.63$ p > 0.05 |
−7.09$ p > 0.05 |
Blood test 2: CRP | −0.787 ± 0.33 | −1.376 ± 0.31 | −1.274 ± 0.35 | 18.28$ p > 0.05 |
−8.67$ p > 0.05 |
*p < 0.05, ** - p < 0.01 vs placebo
$ - Non-parametric Kruskal-Wallis test with post Dunn's Multiple Comparison Test
The overall change from baseline in Curamin, Curamed the placebo group. It was estimated as the effect size (the standard mean difference between baseline and endpoint) and this was compared with the obtained from placebo group control. An increase in all domains represents improvement in symptoms