Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 7;10(1):plx047. doi: 10.1093/aobpla/plx047

Table 5.

Mixed model effects of white-tailed deer a) access/exclusion and b) population density on introduced, native and total plant species richness based on floristic composition data collected from deer-access (unfenced) and deer-exclusion (fenced) plots at 23 sites in east-central and north-eastern USAa. Proportion introduced plant species richness was evaluated based on the interaction of the deer effect with total species richness; a significant interaction indicates that the ratio of introduced to total plant species richness (i.e. proportion introduced) varies with the deer effect. For random effect results, see Supporting Information—Table S3. P values and LSmeans treatment test results are in bold print if significant at the alpha level α < 0.05.

Introduced species richness Native species richness Total species richness
a) Deer access/exclusion
 Intercept (SE) 0.4 (0.2) 3.2 (0.2) 4.0 (0.3)
 DA/DE coefficient (SE) –0.04 (0.07) 0.39 (0.06) 0.32 (0.06)
  F statistic (DFn,DFd) 0.31 (1,220) 46 (1,222) 25 (1,222)
  P value 0.6 <0.001 <0.001
  LSmeans treatment test DE > DA DE > DA
  DA estimate (LCI–UCI) 3.2 (2.7–3.8) 4.0 (3.4–4.5)
  DE estimate (LCI–UCI) 3.6 (3.1–4.1) 4.3 (3.7–4.8)
 Total species richness coefficient (SE) 0.044 (0.004)
  F statistic (DFn,DFd) 160 (1,397)
  P value <0.001
 DA/DE * Total species richness coefficient (SE) 2 × 10−4 (0.003)
  F statistic (DFn,DFd) 0.004 (1,219)
  P value 0.9
n 404 446 446
 # Sites 18 23 23
b) Deer density
 Intercept (SE) 0.2 (0.4) 3.9 (0.4) 4.5 (0.5)
 DD coefficient (SE) 0.005 (0.007) –0.020 (0.009) –0.01 (0.01)
  F statistic (DFn,DFd) 0.64 (1,22) 5.1 (1,19) 2.1 (1,19)
  P value 0.4 0.04 0.2
 Total species richness coefficient (SE) 0.031 (0.008)
  F statistic (DFn,DFd) 15 (1,183)
  P value <0.001
 DD * Total species richness coefficient (SE) 3 × 10−4 (1 × 10−4)
  F statistic (DFn,DFd) 3.9 (1,185)
  P value 0.049
n 190 211 211
 # Sites 17 22 22

aSquare-root transformations of species richness were used to meet the assumption of homogeneity of residuals. SE = standard error; DA = deer access; DE = deer exclusion; DFn = degrees of freedom, numerator; DFd = degrees of freedom, denominator; LCI = lower confidence interval; UCI = upper confidence interval; n = number of observations; DD = deer density.