Skip to main content
. 2015 Dec 22;6(2):80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.jpha.2015.12.003

Table 1.

Comparison of electrochemical methods for rutin detection.

Electrodes Linear range (M) Detection limit (M) Refs.
MWNTs/β-CD 4.0×10−7–1.0×10−3 2.0×10−7 [19]
CNTPE 1.0×10−7–1.0×10−8 4.0×l0−8 [18]
AB nanoparticle/GCE 3.1×10−8–7.8×10−6 1.5×10−8 [21]
GR/CILE 7.0×10−8–1.0×10−4 2.4×10−8 [22]
β-CD@CRG/Nafion/GCE 6.0×10−9–1.0×10−5 2.0×10−9 [20]
GNs/GCE 1.0×10−7–1.0×10−5 2.1×10−8 [23]
GR-MnO2/CILE 1.0×10−8–5.0×10−4 2.7×10−9 [36]
SWCNTs/Au electrode 2.0×10−8–1.0×10−6 1.0×10−8 [37]
SWCNTs/CILE 1.0×10−7–1.7×10−6 7.0×10−8 [38]
ERGO/GCE 4.7×10−7–1.2×10−5 1.8×10−8 This work

MWNTs: multi-walled carbon nanotubes. β-CD: β-cyclodextrin. CNTPE: multi-wall carbonnanotube paste electrode. AB nanoparticle: acetylene black nanoparticle-modified electrode. GCE: glassy carbon electrode. GR: grapheme. CILE: carbon ionic liquid electrode. β-CD@CRG: β-cyclodextrin@chemically reduced grapheme. GNs: graphene nanosheets. SWCNTs: single-walled carbon nanotube. ERGO: electrochemically reduced graphene oxide.