Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2017 Nov 22;197:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.11.039

Table 4.

Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for moderation of the association between SNAP enrollment and depression by perceptions of government assistance among mothers eligible for SNAP1 during FFCWS waves 2 to 42

Dimensions of Government Assistance Perceptions3 OR4 (95% CI) Interaction p-value
Perception of Participating 0.0208
 Maintain personal freedom 0.27 (0.08, 0.89)
 Do not maintain personal freedom 1.13 (0.85, 1.51)
Perception of Application Process 0.101
 Not humiliated 0.49 (0.19, 1.26)
 Humiliated 1.12 (0.84, 1.49)
Maintain Personal Freedom and Not Humiliated 0.110
 Yes 0.39 (0.11, 1.35)
 No 1.10 (0.83, 1.46)
1

Defined as those with a ≤ 2.00 PIR

2

Depression measured using the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form (CIDI-SF)

3

Interactions tested separately in models that account for study wave and time-variant PIR, marital status, employment status, and food insecurity.

4

Odds of depression when enrolled in SNAP vs. not enrolled

SNAP=Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program; FFCWS=Fragile Families and Child Wellbeing Study; PIR=Poverty to Income Ratio