TABLE 3. Categorical Sensitivity and sPecificity Comparison of the Proposed Algorithm With Urinalysis Analyzer Machine (UAM).
| Composition | Category | Actual Concentration array | Average of UAM | Average of Proposed Method | Categorical sensitivity of Proposed Method | Categorical specificity of Proposed Method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urobilinogen | Safe | 2 | 2 | 1.9 | 100% | 100% |
| Risk | 3 | 3 | 3.3 | 100% | 100% | |
| High | 5 | 5 | 5.0 | 100% | 100% | |
| Glucose | Safe | 2 | 2 | 2.1 | 100% | 100% |
| Risk | 3 | 3 | 3.4 | 100% | 100% | |
| Risk | 4 | 4 | 4.4 | 100% | 100% | |
| High | 5 | 5 | 5.1 | 100% | 100% | |
| High | 6 | 6 | 5.2 | 100% | 100% | |
| Bilirubin | Safe | 1 | 2 | 2.0 | 100% | 100% |
| High | 5 | 5 | 3.9 | 100% | 100% | |
| Ketone | Safe | 1 | 1 | 1.1 | 100% | 100% |
| Risk | 3 | 3 | 2.2 | 100% | 100% | |
| High | 4 | 4 | 3.0 | 90% | 90% | |
| S.G. | Safe | 2 | 2 | 2.1 | 100% | 100% |
| High | 4 | 4 | 4.5 | 80% | 80% | |
| Blood | Safe | 2 | 2 | 2 | 100% | 100% |
| ´ | ||||||
| pH | Safe | 1 | 1 | 1.8 | 100% | 100% |
| Protein | Safe | 1 | 1 | 1.1 | 100% | 100% |
| Risk | 4 | 4 | 3.4 | 90% | 80% | |
| High | 6 | 6 | 4.1 | 80% | 80% | |
| Nitrite | Safe | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% |
| Leukocytes | Safe | 1 | 1 | 1 | 100% | 100% |