Table 3.
Logistic regression models of the three most common aversions in the food photo ratings. Displayed are top AIC-ranked models of each aversion. Coefficients are odds ratios (95% CI). Jenu Kurubas are the base level for Population. The last row indicates if the top-ranked model for that food aversion supports an a priori prediction.
| Variable | Nuts/seeds/legumes | Sweets | Grains |
|---|---|---|---|
| Population (Rural farmer) | 2.72 (1.32, 5.78) | 1.01 (0.4, 2.6) | 0.733 (0.398, 1.35) |
| Food insecurity (centered) | 1.94 (0.986, 3.99) | ||
| Age | 1.07 (0.933, 1.23) | ||
| Education | 0.909 (0.806, 1.02) | ||
| Observations | 102 | 102 | 102 |
| Null deviance (df) | 152 (101) | 140 (101) | 93.9 (101) |
| Residual deviance (df) | 144 (99) | 136 (98) | 92.9 (100) |
| Chisqr | Chisq (2) = 7.98* | Chisq (3) = 4.74 | Chisq (1) = 0.988 |
| AIC | 207.3 | 143.7 | 187 |
| Tjur’s D | 0.039 | 0.046 | 0.0049 |
| Supports a priori prediction | Yes | No | No |