Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190512. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190512

Table 4. Subgroup analyses for association between LSM and overall postoperative complications.

Group factors Subgroup studies Combined OR 95%CI Heterogeneity P value
I2
Regions Asia 10 2.30 1.75, 3.04 63.2% 0.004
Europe 3 1.12 1.00, 1.26 78.5% 0.010
Technique of LSM MRE 2 2.24 1.74, 2.89 0.0% 0.536
TE 7 1.30 1.11,1.52 48.3% 0.085
SWE 2 1.98 1.16, 3.30 46.1% 0.173
ARFI 2 9.74 0.39, 240.25 76.2% 0.040
Outcome Composite complications 3 2.87 1.65, 5.00 47.3% 0.150
PHLF 7 1.46 1.23, 1.74 84.7% 0.000
ascites 2 7.70 0.17, 341.88 82.9% 0.000
Hepatic insufficiency 1 19.14 2.71, 135.27 NA NA
Etiology of CLD Mixed 11 1.74 1.42, 2.13 87.0% 0.000
Viral hepatitis 2 1.89 1.02, 3.49 62.0% 0.105
Stage of fibrosis The percentage of patients with fibrosis grade F4≥50% 7 1.32 1.11, 1.57 80.4% 0.000
The percentage of patients with fibrosis grade F4<50% 6 2.20 1.60, 3.01 64.2% 0.016

LSM, liver stiffness measurement; TE, transient elastography; SWE, shear wave elastography; MRE, magnetic resonance elastography; ARFI, acoustic radio force impulse; CLD, chronic liver diseases.