Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0190936. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190936

Fig 2. Stimulation points were affected by two factors and its corresponding finger angles.

Fig 2

(A) The effect of stimulation point displacement relative to the skin on the finger activation threshold and the selective range of each individual finger were investigated. (B) The negative electrode was placed at distances of 0L, 1L, 1.414L, and 2L away from the center of the original electrode to study whether different electrode positions caused the changes in the activation threshold and selective activation range of individual fingers. (C) The IMU sensor module was used to record the 3D finger movement angle data.