Skip to main content
. 2018 Jan 11;13(1):e0191093. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191093

Fig 9. Forest plot: PRP vs control, meta-analysis 3: Number of healings (negative ES, positioned on the left of the null value: favours control; positive ES, positioned on the right of the null value: favours PRP).

Fig 9

Heterogeneity analysis: Q = 7.59; df = 1; P = 0.006; I2 = 86.82; T2 = 1.68; T = 1.30. (ES: effect size; 95%CI: confidence interval; W: weight; V: variance; SE: standard error; Sig: statistical significance (p-value); N: total sample size; N1: sample size PRP group; N2: sample size control group; Q, I2, T2 and T: indexes of heterogeneity; df: degrees of freedom).