Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 14.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Nephrol. 2017 Dec 14;46(6):488–497. doi: 10.1159/000485326

Table 2.

Comparison of Biomarkers During Follow-Up According to Development of End-Stage Renal Disease

Comparison of Biomarkers in those that develop ESRD (n=668) vs. Not (n=3,370)
Time Prior to ESRD/Modified End of Follow-up P-values
Biomarker 3 years 2 years 1 year Time of ESRD/mEnd of Follow-up Estimated Time of Divergencea Equality Interaction
Placebo Group
ESRD vs. not (P-difference) ESRD vs. not (P-difference) ESRD vs. not (P-difference) ESRD vs. not (P-difference)
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 10.4 vs 10.3; p=0.10 10.3 vs 10.5; p=0.001 10.2 vs 10.7; p<0.001 9.5 vs 10.9; p<0.001 2.1 years <0.001 <0.001
Darbepoetin (Mean Dose in mcg/month) 1.3 vs 3.9; p=0.019 3.2 vs 3.4; p=0.82 7.4 vs 3.3; p<0.001 18.5 vs 3.8; p<0.001 1.4 years <0.001 <0.001
Darbepoetin Dose Difference ([ESRD – non-ESRD] in mcg/month) −2.6 −0.2 +4.1 +14.7 1.4 years <0.001 <0.001
Ferritin (mcg/L)b 147 vs 105; p<0.001 148 vs 114; p<0.001 172 vs 132; p<0.001 204 vs 153; p<0.001 >3 years <0.001 0.36
Transferrin Saturation (%) 24.9 vs 22.6; p=0.007 24.5 vs 24.0; p=0.3 26.1 vs 25.2; p=0.07 24.3 vs 26.0; p=0.014 N/A <0.001 <0.001
CRP (mg/L)b, c 3.7 vs 3.0; p=0.05 3.9 vs 3.2; p=0.007 3.9 vs 3.5; p=0.06 5.8 vs 3.7; p<0.001 0.6 years <0.001 0.006
Darbepoetin Group
ESRD vs. not (P-difference) ESRD vs. not (P-difference) ESRD vs. not (P-difference) ESRD vs. not (P-difference)
Hemoglobin (g/dL) 11.2 vs 11.4; p=0.05 11.7 vs 11.8; p=0.036 11.9 vs 12.1; p<0.001 11.5 vs 12.5; p<0.001 1.6 years <0.001 <0.001
Darbepoetin (Mean Dose in mcg/month) 131 vs 136; p=0.42 138 vs 148; p=0.08 162 vs 161; p=0.95 232 vs 177; p=<0.001 0.6 years <0.001 <0.001
Darbepoetin Dose Difference ([ESRD – non-ESRD] in mcg/month) −5 −10 +1 +55 0.6 years <0.001 <0.001
Ferritin (mcg/L)b 92 vs 78; p<0.001 119 vs 98; p<0.001 151 vs 122; p<0.001 179 vs 150; p=0.005 >3 years 0.002 0.73
Transferrin Saturation (%) 22.0 vs 20.9; p=0.3 25.6 vs 25.7; p=0.94 29.8 vs 29.8; p=0.94 29.5 vs 32.2; p=0.002 0.2 years 0.008 0.005
CRP (mg/L)b, c 2.9 vs 3.2; p=0.35 3.5 vs 3.1; p=0.14 3.6 vs 3.4; p=0.41 5.3 vs 3.7; p<0.001 0.4 years <0.001 <0.001

P values refer to the difference in average biomarker concentrations between those that did and do not develop ESRD at specific time points (time of event or end of follow-up; 1 year prior; 2 years prior; or 3 years prior). Equality tests the null hypothesis that the curves are superimposable (i.e. differences in biomarkers between groups); P for Interaction tests the null hypothesis that the curves are parallel (i.e. differences in biomarker trajectories over time).

a

Estimated time of divergence of biomarkers of interest (developed ESRD vs. not) was defined as the latest time at which the difference in point estimates became significant at α=0.01.

b

Groups are summarized and compared using geometric means

c

Individuals with undetectable CRP (≤3 mg/L) were assumed to have a CRP=1.5 mg/L